The International Hair Colour Chart Icc

gender researcher does away with the criticism of Islam

admits women from brown to

a willing helper clears wrong about our understanding of Islam

or Christina von Braun's fantastic fantasies about Islam

04/14/2007 wife of Brown in an interview with the Tagesspiegel

http://www.tagesspiegel.de/sonderthe...07/3158467.asp
"veil are like a second skin"

The cultural scientist Christina von Braun explained how the West misunderstands Islam (Daily Mirror)

• TS: "Today is behind the veiled woman, identified sleeper '. Hence the need to unveil it. Paradoxically, therefore, just those required by their invisibility that characterizes the sleeper and can seem so dangerous, "write Christina von Braun and Bettina Mathes in her new book," Veiled Reality. Women, Islam and the West. " The gender researchers debunk prejudices, the veiled women, Islam and the Orient concern. The orientation on the gender order, the exchange between Orient and Occident in the context of religion, history and culture, without significantly the risk of terrorism or the repression the woman is played down "

the interview and our commentary.

TS: wife of Brown, what do you want to put your readers on the way?

• Brown: "The book is Toolbox for those who want to learn more about what is cultural history behind the cultural exchanges with Islam. It's also about what the Western projections on Islam, such as an allegedly violent and backward religion, we have of the West. On closer examination it becomes clear that one can not speak of "the" Islam, but Pakistani, Moroccan, Turkish and Saudi Arabian Islam is completely different. The reader will also learn more about what is being produced in the West about the female body in fantasies. "

The stoning of women, although no Western fantasies. But for Brown & co Islamic marriage law is apparently everywhere "completely different", only to western law, there is no difference.

• TS: What fantasies produce the people in the West, for example?
  fantasies about the peaceful Islam?
  
• Brown: "Western society has a rapid stripping the female body seen as a sign of the freedom, emancipation, progress is reported, however, a naked breasts has nothing to do with these values. Unfortunately, some women have this interpretation appropriated and reproduce it.
  TA: emancipation is associated with education, equal wages for equal work, access to professional and scientific bodies.

This will probably be the Islamic values?

• Brown: "We have tried to show how strongly related the exposure of the female body with the development of photographic equipment, this type of stripping demand in the public domain, because it exemplifies the female body, a certain idea of progress. "

It is not the photographic equipment, undress the women. They could just as well strip the men.

• TS: Another example is the issue of honor killing ...

The honor killing is here for the first time downgraded to the "question of honor killing." It is as if one were to ask for the "Question of the concentration camps" held after the concentration camp.

• Brown: "which is justly accused and treated as a violation of human rights."

Oh really? In honor killing, they understand first the many Western honor killings that have become standard for some time in the left-Islamic consciousness (!).

• Braun : "It's amazing is that the frequent murders of wives or partners who want to separate from their husbands or have separated, do not run into the same rebellion.

marriage murders of women in the West are still a crime and punishable by law, no honor! In Islam, however, the wife-murder of male honor is legal! The man can beat up the wife first according to Islamic holy law, a small difference that the left-handed men of the beauticians jungle law does not seem to know, the democratic legal order, in contrast to God's law is not a term. Second, it must include the man after the woman Koran with impunity until they die, that is, kill them if they disobeyed. The woman is stoned for adultery under Islamic law, which seems to be irrelevant to the Islamic Beschönigerinnen legalized violence against women.
outrage over this "Traditions & Customs" is the lack of culture, they legalized and the gentleness with which they are rewarded by the local judiciary.

• Brown: " It is about similar phenomena associated with the long history of the sacralization of marriage in the Christian society."

polygamy complacent?

• Brown: "Christianity is the only religion in the world which has declared the insolubility of marriage. This is the 19th Century the idea of love marriage and transferred were "secularized." A fusion of ideal, which means that some men want their wives to part, this low as a violation not only of themselves, but also the institution of marriage experience and access to the weapon. About this "honor killings", in Germany five, six times occur in the week in the papers read at most a few lines. "

The insolubility of marriage, which by any democratic legal system in" Christian societies "format is more, the reason should be the wife-killings? First, there would more husbands than wives murder murder, and second, the marriage would be correspondingly rare murders of women in Islamic societies. Because in Islam the marriage is not indissoluble, they can always be resolved by Verstossungsscheidung by the man, he only has to say Talaq three times, and you have the woman leave the house and does not see her children again.
What dishes up women from brown here is nonsense. But what is a real helper patriarchy, which is a loss for no justification for the extreme male violence against women. Are forced marriages of children aged nine and under current law in Europe until the 19th Century been the practice? There is never a Christian culture of honor killings, even if Europe had long been a patriarchal marriage law, which was democratically reformed in Christian societies.
It is left twisted logic, all the barbarities koranlegalisierten reflexively attaches the first Christians in Islamic countries today be pursued. What was that again with the stoning? It is also less a Christian than a left '68 judiciary, which until now prevented the appropriate criminal penalties on felons and thus contribute to honor killings and forced marriages. Forced marriages are the way, no Christian morals. The brownish-red flash drives swamp flowers. If we understood correctly Mrs. von Braun, then come murders of women in Europe do not masculine brutality and property claims, but the ideal of love. According to this way of thinking arise then probably rape the ideal of love. Wife murder as a result of the love match. Then it is with the rape of the ideal of love and the "merger" due to moral. Wife murder as a result of the love marriage, because the killers feel merged so with the woman that they want to get rid of them permanently? Just strange that no more husbands are murdered as women who have yet to suffer in the West under the domestic violence much more than marital rapists. Very strange
that Islam, which knows no love match, only the forced marriage and child marriage, then yielding many more murders of women as the "ideal love" of the West, even though the supposed love motive is entirely absent. But Mrs. Brown is not embarrassed by the statements of the murders of women, its causes must lie primarily in the "Christian" West, although in the East thousands of times be committed legally. From Iraq to Iran.
Strange that there is in Islam, which knows no love match, only the forced marriage and child marriage, far more women's killings in the West where they are liable to prosecution, even though the alleged love motive is missing. But assistants are never at a loss for explanations of all murders of women, its causes must lie primarily in the West, even if they are committed in the Orient masses quite legal.

• TS: behaves as it is in Islam?
• Brown: "The logic of honor killing is similar. If the woman does not behave the way the tribe is considered honorable, it has betrayal of tribe and family committed. You must be eradicated so that the honor is restored. In West and East are experiencing the perpetrators of mitigating circumstances. "

This woman is the small difference between a criminal act and criminal sanctions, a legal wife murder is not clear. Although many murders of women in the West with extenuating circumstances will be rewarded for their husbands: they are not decided by Familierat and the younger brothers of the clan delegates to remain unpunished. Interesting what this brown sauce so everything vorquillt. Mrs. Brown knows a case:

• Brown: has been a German man, of carrying a loaded gun to the meeting with his former partner appeared and ordered them killed, not for murder but only of manslaughter. "

There are even many cases of such judgments. Lenient sentences for killers are best-known of the 68 judiciary. The perpetrators left Affairs Justice has in fact similar to the Islamic law men, but we did not know that it is the 68-Justice is a specially Christian tradition. Clemency for killer of women is also known in the West, in Islam it is the rule and applicable law, that the man if at all only a mild punishment threatened, it is generally, impunity for the "honor killings" in Muslim societies, such as Amnesty International documented some of Pakistan or, as is still common in Turkey, where thousands of underage girls are still married, even if the law is no more. For women murder of the Men of honor by the husband, it is in Turkey, still criminal discount, let alone in other Muslim lands, where as in Jordan, Pakistan, Sudan, are in Saudi Arabia, numerous murders of women not only in court, but as suicides etc . be covered up and the police play (read among others, Amnesty) with each year of the 1000 honor killings in Pakistan alone. Not in Germany. Mrs. von Braun seems the woman murders in Germany by Muslim men to expect all the German cases and to consider fines as they are not Islamic law may be different from democratic. In Muslim perpetrators, there is no sense of wrongdoing, there is honor killing decide the proper law of the husband or the "family" in which the male members of it and run. But the law clerk-men rescue the honor of Muslim men to be defended against the law.
That there is a legal assistant linkspatriarchale men, was already clear to see as many years ago a television movie by a certain Christina von Braun on "Parents" was all over the world, especially in the developing world, where the minor girls were with the children as "parents" was presented. Of fathers hardly anything was visible. The filmmaker with the equal doctrine adopted in the head either not true that it is not 'parents' concerns if the 16jähren with a child in the bundle on his back and left in the abdomen, with no trace of the "partner", also called a rapist invisible, but the mothers. The Gleichheitsideologinnen replaced by the mothers of the "partnership" fiction.

• TaZ: you want more tolerance in dealing with Muslims in Germany and see the parallels between the debates about Islam and those of Jews in the 19th and early 20. Century.

Perhaps a debate on Islamic anti-Judaism and the left anti-Semitism?

• Brown: "The whole vocabulary of the" Jews of the decomposed body of the people ", has a long tradition and is now transferred to terrorism."

That was predictable. Islamic terrorism is an invention of critics of Islam, Islamic terrorists are the true victims, helpless as the Jews at the time of the Nazis. It is felt that the real terror of Israel and the U.S.. That Jews in Germany at the time of its worst persecution and extermination in Germany terror made have as Muslims against Israelis, such a thought is far from Mrs. Brown. Terrorism is pursued as the Jews? Mrs. Braun is hereby understood what was expected: that the Jews are the real terrorists, not Islamic terrorists that we may pursue, that would be as anti-Semitism. To it does not seem to be so far away. You know after all that Islam has something to do with terrorism? Where? Is not the real terror to the left of understanding Israel and the U.S.? That the Jews in Germany not even the time of their extinction as did the feudal terror with oil-and EU-funds-equipped jihadis, it must be entgegangen.

• Brown: " The image of the sleeper for an invisible enemy is taken from the medical vocabulary. "

The pictures of Ms Brown come from the brown model. Even the former Muslim brothers were worth protecting friends who had been wronged by the Jews. All that is missing to complete the next fascist perversion, is the recognition that the Israelis are the Nazis of today who terrorize the persecuted Muslims. Seems to originate from the same source, which also funded the Steinbach Institute.

• Brown: "This means the cancer cells that are not active, but suddenly their destructive Force to develop and break down the mechanism inside. This imagery has a sinister past and is completely absurd, if it is transmitted not only to terrorists but also to the veiled woman. "

that it is the terrorist sleepers in the Islamist cells are fantasies, that proof Mrs. Braun is still guilty. But it holds perhaps the attack on the WTC, which was designed by including such a cell in Germany, perhaps for a defamation of the perpetrators and the terrorist investigation for a form of persecution of innocent Muslims who face a holocaust. Since when are women headscarf called a sleeper except? But the question of the ideology of the Islamic headscarf worn ostentatiously promoted militant Notes for Mrs. von Braun not to criminalize criticism of religion rather than the jihad kritisert

• TS: Wa around the veil is for this imagery?

The Vollvermummung is still, for all other things in addition to submission of the woman, for example to transport explosives.

• Brown: "The veiled woman symbolizes the unknown, the foreign body does not belong in our society and therefore excluded. The result is that a society that is Christian defined as Germany, as well as a strictly secular society characterized as France come to the same result, namely a ban on the headscarf in schools. "

obscured the red brown draped lady specifically the fact that it is the Islamic uniform, which excludes Muslim women and not the German or Christian society. Who are the infidels as sub-humans? Who banned the Muslim women in black bags as a foreign body from the male-dominated public? The left brain does Western society responsible for the Islamic Fraueneinsperrung in tight cloths, cages and in fabric bags exclude them from the public. Left rotation of the logic of power relations, lousy dishonest, ideologically cranky and bent. Perhaps a Steinigungsverbot for the prostitutes, the Lord, people, culture the same as a stoning sentence and its execution. The ban excluded from even the pious woman from the Umma, and also forbade the veiling of the head of Steinigungsopfers in white cloths.

• TS. In the Catholic countries of Italy and Austria, officials allowed the wearing of the veil. What is different there ?
• brown. "Austria is known from the monarchy has a long tradition of coexistence with Muslims. "

Austria has extended 1683 the coexistence do not strange. But today, the Sharia marriage law in force in Austria legal practice. It regulates not so much the living together of Muslims with non-Muslims rather than primarily the coexistence of Muslim women with Muslim men, but women of brown, so must live with anyone under Islamic law and its long tradition.

• Brown: " The company is much stronger set of intercultural exchange, similar to the northern Mediterranean countries Italy and Spain, for centuries a great exchange with the North African and Muslim countries know . "

The great exchange was primarily in the raids of Muslim pirates on the Mediterranean coast, where worried they prey on their slave markets. The" exchange "with the conquered Christian Spain woman seems very made sense to have. Finally, Europe owes this exchange, the greatest cultural treasures such as the minarets of Christians skulls, what evidence must be from a high estimate of Christians skull by the Muslims. The predecessor of Mrs. von Braun in the culture of science, the deep-Sigrid Hunke sends his regards. Again Allah the sun shines on the West tans and their heads.
There is still the big woman exchange that goes far beyond the Mediterranean countries that import the Islamic countries eventually forced their brides to the northern European countries, often against dowry.

• Brown: " France as an occupying power in Algeria less acted intercultural."

Less inter-culturally, the Ottoman conquerors, who brought the conquered infidels in the Dhimmistatus? (Exchange of protection money for food.) Maybe she thinks yes to the intercultural approach of the Muslims in the Turks, when they were still Christian was? Or in the Near East, the ancient Christian population has been decimated to rest on stocks under the rule of Islam? The replacement of the Islamic conquerors with the conquered dhimmis was for the former always very fruitful. Mrs. Brown seems to draw their history of Islam directly from the revelations of Nazisse Hunke, which today would be a left islamophile. At present, finds a great cultural exchange in the form of expulsion of Christians from the Middle East. They do not flee from Jews.

• Brown: " behind the goal to unveil the Algerian woman was, the idea of the country, its social structure and its natural resources with Western thinking and to occupy for the benefit of Western colonial power. "

Finally comes the red trolley from the brown bag at the very fore of the Prophet. A motherless offspring of the next Islamic law men. Criticism of women in Islamic Fraueneinsperrung - in the house or Strassse in bags with mesh before then, in burrows in order to stoning for disobedience - all this is nothing but the colonialist Western feminist terrorist who has it in for the raw material resources of Muslim countries and with the one, the Muslim seeks to seize resource to them in the harem of the West and barter to abduct children as husbands. It the Western colonial powers like the U.S. and Israel, which occupied the Muslim woman and her depraved fantasies west. Therefore, the Muslim women are veiled, so they are protected from the colonial gaze of Westerners that they want to sell their slaves to Arab markets. Finally!

Islam from the perspective of the German tourist. It is the enemy left the West, which amalgamated with the Islamic here, it may be only the depraved West, which will occupy the Muslim woman with his depraved fantasies. The Muslim must therefore be of the Muslim men are locked up in harems and hidden under the burqa, to protect them from the colonial order Eyes of Westerners, is protected. responsible

As for Mrs. Brown monogamy for women's murders in the West, although they are much more common in the polygamous culture of Islam, the West has led to the incarceration of women in black bags cause or how? And if their owners cut through the disobedient wife's throat, that was colonialism ... - What? The social and sexual mutilation of women under Islam, which are supplied ready for the Muslim men and slaughtered during offense is not their problem. The colonization of the dark continent of femininity Islamic Rohpatriarchat that occupied the body of the woman up in the intestines, is not a woman of brown term.

• TS: Why do young women voluntarily a veil?
• Brown: (...) "Imagine a woman from a Turkish village from which arrives in the big city of Berlin and meets a strange language and culture. Again, the veil serves as a protection against the new, strange world who feel the women as dangerous. It is a kind of second skin. "

Yes we imagine that the women of Anatolia, which are still forced to marry in rows in childhood, from the western colonialists who seek to protect themselves from this, if they are only abroad, where the German colonial rulers want them locked up in their harems, and where there are still stoning and flogging. And lawyers like Seyran Ates, before they have to protect themselves, because otherwise they will be beaten by this lawyer on the street. Or What are the women of Anatolia in the strange world may well be afraid? What can be so dangerous to be next in your vicinity? Whether they are afraid to meet Christina von Braun? That's can not be, they're illiterate.
rvc April 2007

(Interview by Ljiljana Nikolic. In the long night on June 9, Christina von Braun reads from the book in the main building, Space 3094/96, 18 clock. You should send a few husbands of the clients of attorney Ates and inculcate them, was said to a woman who knows anything about women's rights. )
______________________

The news of Theo van Gogh-society "of 04/24/2008, we read:

Ayatollah CHRISTINE - simply

in Zaman (Turkish mass press)
Wednesday, 04.23. 08 -

offenses call for Muslims distancing you from the terror

Zaman reported on the presentation of cultural studies, Christina von Braun in the discussion board of the forum for reflection Intercultural Dialogue (FID) in Berlin.
you find that it simply be insulted if you exhort Muslims to distance themselves from terrorism. As a counter example, she warned:
it asks the Catholic Church or the Pope, nor that they have to distance itself from terrorism because of the Irish IRA terrorist organization will be conducted.
noticed general, the cultural historian, that there were similarities between anti-Semitism and Islamophobia. One could tell by the debate over the mosque and the headscarf.
------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------
Commentary Theo van Gogh Company: *
a genuine descendant of the V 2 Wernher von Braun Nazi family. - On behalf of the Vatican, there were dozens of convictions by the way the IRA.

• ______________________________________
  _______________________________________
  
  The Great Illusion
  
  February 2006
  
  on a BBC website can be found under the Rubric Muslim feminists contributions of women who support within Islam for women's rights and you think, which were to have the correct interpretation of the Koran, which had been interpreted incorrectly by men. See Islam feminists (BBC 31/10/2005):> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4384512.stm
  Dort ist ungfähr die Position der „feministischen“ Islam-Apologetin Mernissi, die auf der Website www.secularislam.org schon hinreichend widerlegt wurde. >Mernissi-Kritik von Reza Afshari: >http://reginevancleev.blogspot.com/2010/02/egalitarian-islam-and-misogynist.html
  
  Regine van Cleev (2001 as unbeliever in the discusssion forum of ISIS):
  
  Islamic feminists“ are trying to square the circle with islamic gender jihad - a fundamental contradiction in itself as would be “Fashist Human Rights activists”. If you are a feminist you must leave the deeply patriarchal religion of Mohammed who not only approved the assassination of his female critics like Asma bint Marvan, a pregnant poetress, who was slaughtered for having written satirical verses against the “prophet”, but also ordered the distribution of female booty to his gang and justified all sexual use of them (as legitimezed in the “holy” Quran.) What about sura 4.34 inviting men to beat their wives in case of disobedience? What's the interpretetion please of beat them? Or of 2.223? Are you really a tilt man can make use of whenever he wants and however he wants? Even on the back of a camel? (Read their hadith...) The Quran is not only “interpreted” by men, as these female apologists say, but also written by men, lika sharia, the deeply inhuman sacred male islamic law against the most fundamental women’s human rights.
  Do they want to adore the owner of a harem and as many other female slaves as he liked to capture?
  Do they want to believe in the divine mission of a man who “married” a six year od girl still playing with puppets and is said to have “consummated marriage” with her when she was nine? But if they leave islam and become an apostate like Taslima Nasreen, the feminist Ex-Muslima, exiled from her native islamic country, bedause she did not confuse feminism with anti-feminism, they are threatened with death-fatwas by the “religion of peace.” That’s why they even do not dare to think in terms of feminism, originating in western democracies, but still in those of the most antifeminist religion of the world. There is no such thing as "feminist" jihad within in a religion authorized by a male prophet who assisted the stoning of women, who vindicated man's right to control them as his property, Acquired by polygamous marriage or by mere slavery, a man who allowed the marriage of children, the example was given by Which for himself. How is this venerable man for the Muslim feminists or how credible is the Quran ? could
  ______________________________

A week after the election victory of Hamas can no longer look woman without a headscarf in Ramallah, told us Sarah S. from Jerusalem, also with great skepticism the increasing influence of the Orthodox Jews in Israel compared to the Liberals observed that - remember also under pressure from Islamic militancy, both internally and externally are increasingly on the defensive, which is especially for women in the states in Muslim countries. As orthodox in Jerusalem already requires gender apartheid in public buses, chaste clothing for women, etc. A development that has its parallel in the islamophile Europe, where the judiciary is already talking to Sharia law.

talking Meanwhile apologists of Islam, the future under Hamas beautiful. Germany
The radio did not let it take to interview shortly after the election (January 25, 2006) a Palestinian teacher who said cheerfully fresh, it was not worse to expect the situation for women under Hamas. No other voice could be heard in Germany to hold. No Sharia injured or threatened-wife was allowed to speak, only the welcome committee of Hamas from the DLF.

The Frankfurter Rundschau seems that Hamas is not only a hope for the world to keep it as what it is on the German dhimmis still popular, the desire has long been quietly winning over the small and the great Satan. After her victory the terrorist brotherhood is certainly under suspicion of acting as peacemaker. For it is far identified in Eurabia and the OIC, that Israel is the troublemaker of world peace. That Hamas also worked so well to the outside looks like inside, wound up by Israeli disruptive to world peace, we knew already. But that they specifically the hope of the women is that is new in a sense, not, but it is always fascinating and again, as the fascination of Fascist violence and the seed field, which he also voluntarily assumed the very best intentions.

rvc 2006