Thursday, October 28, 2010

Wrinkle Lotion And Oliy Skin

The giant and his adorant

gigantic success story

In the pious Arab world next to Hitler and Mohammed bin Laden as a hero. The so-called worship of great men restricted by smaller men and not for the Orient. She is also the operating principle of the local patriarchy. The admiration murderous megalomania of male religious or political genre is part of the ritual of Respektbezeugungen, with the incense, the men passing each other collectively or individually, if they prove the leading figures of mass collectives their respects. The kow-towing to the "great man" numerous animated males in their self-esteem and gives nor the last Wicht an importance that confers the collective to the alpha bull and guaranteed that the collective, especially when his weight is based on violence.

violence is fascinating for the admirers of such hordes Guide figures. In the cultural section of the editorial is the favorite word for the "great man" is "outstanding".

The "World Week", which houses the Swiss media, although the most critical of Islam article, can not resist the kowtow before the "big man" who makes history. An Islam expert Thomas Widmer excels there with his contribution to the glorification of the leaders figure Mohammed ( a giant on the shoulders of other , WW 21/06),-a collection of festive Schmu to the beard of the "prophet" who can get out of all our readers and readers who know the Life of "giant", only a mild smile so much whether service skills before Horde a war leader, on his behalf and to have millions of people were slaughtered. Widmer trying to gloss over what is discreet. Also part of the effort in the belief in the patriarchal leadership. First, it

the brave men know that there have been published recently some "cheeky" cartoons of the "giants" with which we are already in the picture that Thomas Widmer itself will allow no insults against the "giants", but it presents so nicely as possible, as the readers do not know who it is.

Like all apologists and Prophetenbewunderer Widmer begins with the popular among the dhimmis islamophile negative portrayal of the Christian image of the "prophet" as a "false prophet", which raised the "founding figure ridiculous" would be made. Sixteen known to this day, whoever impudence, to call into religion cult figures like the aforementioned "ambassadors" to mock, is punished. With the death. Even if the picture is right.

Since we have Widmer, etc. Assistants that give us the true image of God-sent giant, we still do not know. A fairer picture than that of the unbelievers who did not believe his true revelations and they considered to be lies. Not so the Muslim-devout Thomas Widmer, who knows what it is in fact at this giant. Widmer wants is the man that the giant is "fair" and "a realistic picture of its historical performance" draw. Just as the neo-Nazis a different picture of the historical performance of Hitler than the opponent and the survivors. For what is a gigantic achievement, which is also recognized gigantic. All the recent history of Islam Lore as Bat Ye 'Or, as Robert Spencer, were as Hans-Peter Raddatz not able to do so. But now we have

Widmer! The man who tells us the history of Islam finally right. We the giants also appreciate and not to be insulting to the likes a Widmer of the World Week is not over such an important man before all the women in the solemn Böckel be and so much against women dreckelnden men's house of the editors, the woman preferred manner in and presented as a whore look stupid suspenders Girlies, are not represented need to know who they're talking to.

as Thomas Widmer What the readers against this background, a giant portrait editorial team of the "prophet" is set before, a mixture of verbal and clad only with difficulty coiffed, carefully-selected facts of a wild Mohammedan history of violence and bows before the prophets of the Islamic violence in war against the infidels. Also, the dhimmi can not deny all that he tried to gloss over, the rhetorical retouching is transparent. Thus, the history of violence, which was from the outset those not named as such, but it says that Islam, while Christianity is "only about 350 years after Jesus, the nonviolent, advanced to state power" was "from the beginning also a worldly success-story "was. Force equal Success.

it is certainly true that Islamic violence was sucessful. The Success Story of the political system, Islam continues. A media story as the story of the WW is one of this success story, which eliminated its critics.
Vrgl. http://www.zeit.de/2006/07/Muslime?page=all Islam is the state religion
"story" sounds a little more neutral than the violent history of subjugation of religion, to name the author is careful not to of the "giants" crouches like a sanctuary. It is in Newspeak about Islam not to Gewaltfreudigkeit of the founder, but "Beyond these efforts and mutual action." How nice.

The Prophet sought in fact around the other side, especially those were his efforts to those who are to be carried according to the Koran in the same order of eternal punishment in hell. As the apologist say it of Jihad: a sustained effort. An effort to bring the unbelievers into the afterlife.
"In Mohammed mate .... prayer and action."

That sounds much better than the slaughter of the enemy, the "follow" not on the way of Allah. Fight - war of words to sounds. Which also does not say Wortgemetzel. Combat can be quite elegant ... but that can be of the slaughter of opponents of the "giants" not just claim that they had beheaded, even if they begged for mercy, and that the Koran promises to eternal torments.

For we shall obtain a "giant" in the title of being lifted onto the base, either during his lifetime, hundreds of years after his death to be cheeky! Giants criticism can still taste the head. Although Widmer must then admit it: "66 battles he should have challenged. The violence of Islam is justified by the practice of their origin figure already. "Whether this later repeals the earlier appeasement Sure sentences of the article?

The Gigantesquenerzähler may contain certain facts about "this incredibly effective Existence, "while not denying that, thanks to its incredible violence as effective and is, and will be quoted here in some cases even (because otherwise disclosed to publications). Thus, the massacre of the men of the tribe of Quraiza in the description of Sir William Muir is first presented with the note, it should "be discussed" later how it came about. First, the text quoted by Sir Muir, describing a gigantic Slaughter:

"In the morning commanded Muhammad, who was himself to the spectators of the tragedy that the male prisoners should be brought in groups of five or six. Each One group said in a row on the edge of the trench to sit down, which was destined to be her grave, where they were beheaded, and pushed down the bodies. The slaughter that began in the morning, was continued by torchlight into the evening "

Widmer." If God should send a man to rouse his fellow men, these messages are so specific, that is the time, and therefore the psychological state of the agent reflect. "

Since one can only say, if God should send a man to wipe out the subhumans who do not follow him, these messages are very specific. A few:> just a small sample:

Sura 2, verse 191: "And slay them (the infidels) wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from whence they drove you out, for seduction [to disbelief] is worse than slaughter ...."
Sura 2, verse 193: "And bekämpfet them until the temptation ceased [to disbelief] has, and faith in Allah is there. ... "(The" disbelievers "position because of their pagan believes is a seduction, and therefore must be fought alone.
Sura 2, verse 216)" is prescribed to you the battle, but he is your disgust. But perhaps you hate a thing which is good for you, and perhaps you love a thing that bad for you, and Allah knows and you know not "(This refers to the fight with weapons.) more> http://www.koran.terror.ms


More on the psychological state of" mediator "than Widmer. to learn from Robert Spencer, in: Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam, which describes very accurately according to relevant sources known what the "agent" as each moving at low making his opponents, his ideas did not want to let communicate with violence

. In the Old Testament that was so, said Widmer, occur when the Jewish prophet Isaiah, Daniel, Amos, among others. But there are not still valid today call for the destruction of Jewish all infidels, is subject to all the world to the God of the Jews. The chronicle of the Jewish wars is not a binding religious violence message. It says in the Decalogue, rather, "Thou shalt not kill." This conceals the Islamic calligraphy.

Widmer doctored the violence-loving prophet of jihad, which could not stand that you did not follow him, come to "one of the people who suffer from their society."

whom we will now have the countless people who suffered under the Prophet, Ling is a Frech. Widmer also know what suffered the Prophet not to epilepsy, but the "materialism". And: "He is thirsty for truthfulness. " That could be, or Hans Küng of Ramadan. So it sounds like when an Islam Crawford Butcher of Medina to the Jews portrayed as a giant, and if a ministering dhimmis his beard combed the Prophet.

Drum Wahrhaftigkeitsdürstende began its success story with the attack on the caravans from Mecca, was the companion he massacred, and since it's on materialism suffered, he bagged the loot, which he distributed to his gang. And as he so much longed for truth, he noticed after every massacre that was sometimes too much its annexes, a perfect revelation of Allah one who approved of the slaughter. Appropriation and exploitation of captured women included in the revelations of the Koran. Here is a Hairdresser of the holy beard makes sure that the hair of the Prophet is forbidden to depict the corresponds to the expectations of his admirers imagine.

Mohammed had recognized the danger to him as a true prophet threatened as the Jewish: Drum have the Judeo-Christian doctrine it also left a lasting impression (unfortunately not so "sustainable" to devote a few pages later, not admired the complete independence of Islam .) If there was a public media round in which one might laugh at Mullah tale, without being threatened with death or hit with an ax, Widmer should explain before unbelievers, that Islamic violence is Jewish-Christian origin.
"Few clear commandments" What is my Widmer? Thou shalt not kill? Thou shalt not bear false witness? Also, as far as the Prophet was well marked but not of the Christian teaching sustainable. The truth thirsty knew how to deal with non-violent believers. Something like shapes. The coinage of Judaism must have been so strong that it wiped out the Jews of Medina. For he longed for the true religion in the Widmerschen version. The Lord commanded to exterminate the Jews issued Mohammed So the command to teach more like. Widmer takes the command is "terrific."

The portrait of the thirsty for truth, who suffers from his time and was many a battle with Success is huge. A portrait with a grand beard, which is strongly influenced by Judaism and Christianity. If this is not the completion of all religion! Yes because you can not be rude and disrespectful, yes, because you have to but just on floor as Thomas Widmer from the self-coiffed giant statue, which is so magnificently before us that no readers, no reader longer permitted to laugh softly. Laughter is known to be prohibited, where the prophet and his interpreter, speaks as from the desert, next to the towering prophets raised. The interpreter but he foresaw that the admiration will be limited:

"Many centuries later, modern Europeans" smell (which is obviously not Thomas Widmer) "epilepsy. "where apostasy Widmer scents:

" must be sure "the supporters of the theory of epilepsy "(!), admit" that the prophets of the Bible were sick "

who believes in the Bible must also believe in Mohammed.?

Thomas Widmer is not one of these infidels, but to those who admire the truthfulness of the prophet, the massacre of the Medina needs. What does he admit that there are no mitigating circumstances are for the gigantic slaughter one by the blood of the Jews in the desert, thirsty, of a "faithful messenger" will be "not a juggler, 'or invents each with appropriate verses himself, and not as Leserverschaukler Widmer. Just as the oasis in the desert, the nomadic warrior tribes inspire their raiding, so inspired the leader each time sent down verses to vouch for its veracity. He

he can be the best to his deeds Suren not pretend by anyone arriving from top just in time in need of explanation to any activity.
then the interpretation of the inner voice of the prophets, " free after Watts, the "creative imagination" of the "prophets, poets, writers, painters," said kindly as follows:

"bring you all into a sensible form (pictures, poems, plays, novels), which many feel without being able to fully express it. ".. they proclaim ideas that are connected to the deepest and most central in human experience, where they take up most particularly the special needs of their age and their contemporaries." (W. Montgomery Watt, quoted by Thomas Widmer, so we all know what's driving all of us.)

The beard of the Prophet is now placed in foam so been soaping of hairdressing Widmer, in the endeavor is the reader at the same time with that one brush their eyes and must blow away the foam. is a Wüstenwarlord. which it thirsts for the destruction of his opponent (which is not his wish to go into the trap), here a Schleimbrei stirred with the poets, scriptures, painters, so that human type artist with whom the prophet is nothing cared about earlier, who had slaughtered the poet Asam bint Marwan. As for the paintings, the price of the creative imagination of the prophets is the least said something absurd, or should we think of as the artistic freedom of artists, all have to fear for their lives if they are only a picture of the giants ? Make Even the music is life threatening in some Islamic areas. But Widmer freshly sealed completely happy and carefree straight on to a tinge of truth with his creative reworking of the Horde leader and plunder, which was put into a form, "what many feel." Whatever may have felt the many slaughtered? Widmer seems indeed to be among the many who feel like Mohammed. Not only the faithful, the dhimmis that variety can almost empathize with the Islamic terrorists. Far better than in the Israeli civilians.
What may have felt the many women as the giant after his bloody raids Sexualsklavinnen distributed to his hordes? With what "human experience" the inspiration for the murder of the infidels were so "deeply"? If the murder of a desert Horde vorzilisatorischen the deep human experience that make their victims? Or whose "experience" makes the "prophet"? As for the "special needs of their age and their contemporaries" is concerned, should the contemporary female prey have had very different needs than their Muslim contemporaries. But Widmer seems to assume you have to dip the Butcher of Medina Jews only fast in the tricks of the creative imagination, then he comes as a creative artist inspired poets and peaceful out again. If this is the thirst of the world week after the truth?
Here is the text extract of calligraphy W. Montgomery Watt (Muhammad, Prophet and Statesman, 1961)

"I would begin by Asserting that there is found, at least in some men, what may be called 'creative imagination'. Notable instances are artists, poets and imaginative writers. All these put into sensuous form (pictures, poems, dramas, novels) are what many are feeling but unable to express fully. Great works of the creative imagination have a certain universality Thus, in that they give expression to the feelings and attitudes of a whole generation. They are, of course, not imaginary, for they deal with real things, but they employ images, visual or conjured up by words, to express what is beyond the range of man's intellectual conceptions. Prophets and prophetic religious leaders, I should maintain, share in this creative imagination. They proclaim ideas connected with what is deepest and most central in human experience, with special reference to The particular needs of their day and generation. The mark of the great prophet is the profound attraction of his ideas for those to whom they are addressed. "

Most is central human experience for the man from the men's house Weltwoche central male experience, for female experience is not central to humanity in the men's house, that such beautiful pictures Poems, dramas and novels designed by Islam. Now the fox also includes more of the fabulous production of this story of the creative imagination of the thirsting for submission prophet on the truth of his hallucinations:

"Mohammed would be one that gives the unconscious of his time, a feeling of uneasiness, a language."

As the Prophet did with those who felt a strong discomfort with his powerful message, hides Widmer, who is dazzled by the splendor of the prophets of violence. Also this "unconscious" he writes from the WM Watt. He seeks out the apologists and whisk to the beard of the Prophet, that Gaukelkünste by serious historical studies such as the Bat Ye 'Or, can do without the lard and Schmu from the Zurich stable men, the man lathers the other, would vanish into thin air. For the truth is not as glamorous as the giant statue, which einwichsen islamservilen the males for the bet to bring it for the kuffar to shine. It is still the question of whose unconscious of this leader of his followers, "a language" is said to have awarded if the war lust and greed loot the desert warrior.

The presumption of non-believers, the Prophet Muhammad called a scam by which believers Thomas Widmer In his prior Muslim creeping megalomania zeal "crude" by which he indicates all the prophets faithful that he is not such an infidel worthy of death, but one who throws himself in front of his creative Prophet picture on the ground ..

"It is striking indeed, as his prophets in the course of his 22 years ..."

He does not write about "war years" because it is thirsty for the truth of the prophets and not by the unbeliever and the extinct even eradicate Thomas Widmer would indeed be with those who survive the naughty infidel, it is striking, in fact,
"as him during his 22 years prophets always the right answer from above belongs, if an urgent question. "

As if he might marry the wife of his adopted son, which Allah did not allow the past. But when an urgent question, the nature of Widmer's discretion, because the urgent need for the next wife of the Prophet well as an urgent question to the readers can be served, you know Allah Council and allowed the flight of the Prophet desperately coveted.

"- the other, it takes place in such moments, even back specifically to wait for the inspiration," says Widmer
to us with the authenticity of inspiration plausible not simply from the sky cases, but the result of careful preparation. A case of timing between Allah and his prophet.

"And of course admits every epoch the Magic to a lot more space than our modern"
know the author of Lobgehudels, the magic of the prophetic desires succumbed to fully retire for the inspiration, the editors briefly targeted had , it comes as called. Muhammad is not the schizophrenic voices impaired people, but the era is magic. Harem is also the magic drum into our modern so very popular with contemporary admirers of the giant, the giant of the "power of 41 bulls "should have had what can Widmer shiver in the unconscious awe. He can not say so openly as before, as the era was still all-male as the world week they would like again to understand with women free parliaments and editorial staff, and exclusive drawing from the unconscious of men, if we Watt & cGott right, but it must also be the unconscious of modernity, is not unlike the fascination of the editors of harem bulls explained.

(also known as the awareness of women truncate the left seems to be in the shallows of macho Matsch, otherwise not at all clear why they droves behind a leading bull and a trotting Open macho Makker the cows on the field, which can order the Muslim man when and how they want, like having their brains to mush hit the magic harem)

frankly served Widmer now on the theological stories:. a charlatan had Mohammed for that reason alone can not be because he took so many humiliations on up to his' success. What he had not done as validity addict allegedly. If the man knew what Hitler did during his rise to everything! Including imprisonment. Something reduces the megalomania of an unstoppable "giants" do not know, quite the contrary. Erdogan also was already in custody - and had there his promptings of the famous forts of Islam and the minaret bayonets. Incarceration prevents imagination, nor are they guaranteed their "truthfulness", possibly the delusions that can be amplified diort. Also shop has to be some hard times I go through as long as he is hiding, he must therefore credible? Size lunatic fan and ideological systems of power possessed by men to take a lot of what not do to others that are not guided by such a thirst for power. The argument is kind-hearted. It appeals to a kind of general confidence, but that this man for his "suffering" was contrary to accommodate. We do not.

The first years of Islam are pure humiliation, Widmer writes, as if he were a twelve year old straight out of the Koranic school, where he learned how the Muslims humiliated constantly from the beginning and be offended. The dhimmi served his own naivety in the form of a sentiment that all who know the history of Islam, rather than retouch, can drive the tears. The unbelievers did not believe what the Prophet ordered them to believe. But they had to suffer cruel, for who humiliates Muslims, as he is not Muslim, must pay for it of course. That is self-defense, ask Thomas Widmer, who explains it to them. The prophet may indeed indigenous Faith and the local gods mock, but woe to him who makes fun of the Giants and holds the whole thing for a gigantic bullshit. Asma bint Marwan as the poet, who was already in his lifetime the Prophet not as fascinated by the "giants" like his adorant still in the 21 Century. Quoting a "Muslim opponents of the doings of the giants in Mecca was not weighed as Widmer, you think a Muslim enemy! Those who believe not in Allah, humiliate the Prophet. Swiss Democrats logic?

still Widmer know that the hadiths are written in worshiping intention "notes, but not in what intention he writes himself. He holds the most for the historical truth that the giant is just, just because he can not beat the already-known, for he rebukes those who draw different conclusions than his respectful.

few years after the "calling experience" is mocked and derided was "become brittle," laments Widmer, gives us a Massenmassakrierer and murder principal who left to right its KritkerInnen as victims, and cheer as the ridiculed and persecuted tried. What is kind of a "suffering" because not all do as the caravan robber and human butcher wants of Medina shall bid God be the destruction of the infidels, once he has the power to do! Previously, he has yet to eat chalk, what with Widmer to the "suffering" of the people in power will, which soon turned out in full.

Then he mentioned also the three "old gods" of Mecca, which appear in the "Satanic Verses", but the altschweizer patriarchal mentality that is regenerated on Islam, it will be difficult for the word "goddess" even to mention, that he "under-or by-goddesses" is called. This refers to the three Lat, Uzza and Manat of Mecca, where the upstart Allah, originally appointed a lunar God, Muhammad as the only God, first, a by-God Among others. The fact that the goddesses that were made as usual with the patriarchal usurpation of "daughters" of God's usurper, should be older than God, veiled not only Islamic, but also the local patriarchal religious research, the name of the goddess of little lips gets. For the time being monotheisms have won.

Widmer is far from a critical analysis of the origins of Allah, is the intolerance of the mono God imposed the Meccans. Resistance to it is for him who hurls himself at the stage of Islamic apologia, a "humiliation of Muslims", which is known to date her crude picture of history determined. Widmer refers to doubt notabene crude !

After Mohammed had one once and for all the position of the mono God made clear to the polytheism, writes Widmer, the "pressure" has increased in Mecca. That should be all too understandable to the overbearing pressure that the Muslims practiced at that time the Meccans were to abandon their gods and to follow Muhammad. But the pressure of religious terrorists Widmer is completely unknown, which suggests blindly on the winning side, the success of their bloody Angriffsgemetzel now ascribe to Allah, who will be victorious in the future. Perhaps there also Widmer that make sense at all that Allah every home is lit, do not believe in him, just huge. Mohammed as a benefactor of the Muslims slaughtered in the name of Allah from the rebellious.

But first moves, according to Widmer a Grüpplein of Muslims, the "bears no more reprisals" from to Abyssinia. Why do Muslims have to "repressive measures" bear, which they have provoked, then he is not even one. For what Mohammed wants to Mecca? Turning the Meccans Muslims. Whether the Muslims are being humiliated in Switzerland, not by choice, all Swiss Muslims and Islam does not have the privileges of the state religion, which was announced before the House of Parliament in Bern: Religion comes before democracy? Mohammed the persecuted! Now, even "forged a murder plot against him." Maw Widmer babbles to the Apologetenlegenden simple. Where do we think a murder plot when he had left his people in peace and not attack their caravans. After the death of his uncle, who was not Muslim and probably wisely had his reasons, a Clan Chief Abu Lahab, the Widmer is a "fickle" means, in the footsteps of the apologists. The man was probably not so predictable? He suffered from concerns? Who is not fixed to the prophets, is fickle! Perhaps the man was only brave fickle place and not bent, the pressure group of his nephew, because what did that!

then dies, the wife Khadijah and Muhammad "the aristocratic Umm Salma based." Literally Widmer. As he was the "obsolete", we must imagine ourselves, Widmer sees no need for explanation. If the man is what brings survivors, it belongs to him, of course. Then "reads" he "the intelligent Jewish woman Safiya. How and where he picks up the that? Whether the intelligence of the author to have enough?
Huyai Ibd Akhtab the new chief of the Bani Nadeer which among those who went to Khaibar. hand He was murdered few years later when the Prophet invaded the Banu Quraiza to his daughter Safiyah became the booty of Khaibar the Prophet when fell into the of the Muslims.

for the tribe of Quraiza, the bellwether of the men had been killed, a Jewish tribe, what the Schönshchreiber Widmer was first mentioned in the table, so he followed the stories of the prophets can dish out more sentimental. The massacre of the Jews of Medina to make it not so good. Widmer knows only men from the tribe of Quraiza, enslaved by the women of the harem man with the power of 41 bulls at his horde distributed to any sexual use, not a word. And from this loot "obsolete", the prophet, the "intelligent Jewish woman Safiya." This is probably the grunts and smiles all stable men, not only of the Prophet ..

The "smart Jew" was "taken" after the Butcher of Medina had her entire family be slaughtered. The adorant the giant wants to convey to readers, perhaps, as pro-Jewish, it is they who are now to take without her family had remained in his care .. For the prophet brings in a form it did feel contemporaries at heart, but can not say if they get into the bloody paws one tray. As the "smart" Jew must have felt, after the slaughter of her family, for the booty without concern that with Hans Küng, a race from the great war lord, the statesman Mohammed, raves and barmt with the faithful at the suffering of the Jews. The woman manager, who incorporated in his harem as many female prey, such as war, he was from his campaigns, took what he wanted to see if a six year old Aisha, had to their marriage, the father himself nor asked for a delay, or the wife of his adopted son. His apologists offer the sale as a special favor of the Prophet, a mercy for the women who returned without loving her for the sake of Allah slaughtered relatives after the war raids of the Messenger of Allah, and probably could be even more grateful if they were distributed among the butchers Horde, even the leaders were given the same delay as prey. After his resistible rise of the camel dealer from the caravan robbers to warlords and prophets of the Muslim men's violent right once it was over with the last liberties of women, it had before even given him even more telling, other than the apologists - as his first wife Kadidja him a man adopted. These times were now at the "vocation" of the giants. What a gigantic fairy tale tells the little man!

then "reads" he was still the "maternal" Sauda, the child's father's friend. Namely, he can not get enough. Widmer knows what he is guilty, and Allah granted the next reference to the preventive critics:

"The" polygamy "will begin later Christian polemics, which identify him as a libertine."

Not so Widmer, who knows that the desert can be a Horde leader rake because it's Allah's will that he sexually assaulted a child satisfies that still plays with dolls. The father was not at all as I said in agreement. Alsdo this way can naturally not have been everywhere, as we are facing today is doing to all the abominations of legitimizing greusel. Whether this was the grace of care of the girl? Even today, millions of children to gray-celled Moslem men are bartered, legal under Sharia nine. In Saudi Arabia the desecration of a child Massenspoert the Saudis. From this gigantic episodes no little word with Widmer. Critique of Sexualsklavinnenwirtschaft the harem owner, a woman "obsolete" after another out of the spoils of war, is "controversy" for Widmer, of the assessed completely different "factual" as usual ", ie with the usual patriarchal understanding of the religionsuUnholde, and no mention of discomfort from the gigantic Unappetizing interest of legal child abuse after the Prophet model, which does not affect his mind in the least. Widmer is indeed the prophet "just", he covered up carefully how the gigantic model for all future criminal forced and child marriages, marry his female serfs libertines sexual possession each "obsolete" today. Widmer
"The Muslims themselves see it as the unique virility of the Prophet."
A sentence that resonates in the audible the admiration of the man for the unique power of the Bull prophets, the man nachsagt him. The author of vibrates noticeably in awe of the gigantic harem slave owners and socket distributor. For what purpose, the men's house in the world week, that no women to be this huge success story to speak, like the Geneva brought in under a pseudonym Bat Ye'or living, well that type much of the fat lubricates the prophet beard. It muffelt in the men's stable of editors, where a prophet of the Lord, let the right man who slaughtered his critics, incense as a Giant leaves. All crimes of the Muslim war hordes of women, children, men of the infidels be glossed over with respect. (Where the current crimes of the Islamic male violence laws against women to the language used in the world week be another expert on Islam know that the protest had nothing to do with feminism.) The moderate Islam-critical sheet celebrating the Prophet of Frauenentrechtung as giants.

Because of the pursuer is a fugitive from the merciless butcher his opponent is a hero of justice, from the Judenmassakrierer an avenger of the Muslims, from the greedy caravan robber, the possession of the attack as "spoils among his gang distributed, a harassed victim of the" pressure "against the doings of his gang. The kowtow to the power of tomorrow, in the form of nods from the violence of the past, is groundbreaking. As we continue in this direction the bows to the gigantic power of religious terror?

The man who sneaks around as an envoy of the men's house is a giant harem bulls, the "obsolete", a six-year-old who is still playing with dolls when he raped nine displayed immediately explanations for designed to highlight the religious Unappetizing interest to readers tasty as follows: ". From today's perspective, Mohammed moved to the vicinity of pedophilia"

means

What is "close"? If a current pedophiles not take away a nine-year-old child, and he is moved to the "proximity of pedophilia," but he is a Pädokrimineller. If a 53-year old giant a nine year old girls sexual advances to the body, then he is only "close" to the "pedophile" because not devote the countless imitators of the prophet wants to offend.

(Note Only Front Page Magazine reports on the Muslim Child Brides: http://frontpagemag.com/2010/01/14/muslim-child-brides-in-britain-by-hege-storhaug/)

Here the Muslim Schmuddelmärcherchen moves from the kind of care Widows by the merciful not even on the stoning of women took part in person! Widmer
. "But then, the marriage of a girl of that age is not unusual"
was for the father of the child, the marriage of his daughter not as common as for Mr. Widmer, who hastened to the child marriage to make something perfectly normal. The man has so conspicuously hurry to make the appetites of giants to standard. He knows what to which Time "normal" is. And because it is not unusual at that time as well as slavery and the stoning and beheading and maiming, it is still common today in all Muslim world to marry the girls from nine to be allowed - as in Iran, where the marriage age of nine until recently was, as in Saudi Arabia, where it still applies, and the mass abuse of girls as "temporary marriages" not "unusual" is. Widmer is surely another, why the Kinderzwangsverheiratungen usual today in the Islamic world and not the fault of the men who enforce them. The crime is still far islam normal not only in Saudi Arabia but also in Anatolia, though not legal there, as elsewhere, where the Schariarecht prevails, providing for the children aged nine and marriage is quite legal as well as any forced marriage as legal.

Even the Jews of Medina was determined usual battles for the other band Mohammed, not abnormal. For the Jews it was perhaps less common. The massacre of Jews of Medina prepares modern dhimmi, who paid the head tax to the religious terrorist going to volunteer at as follows.

"Abruptly, Muhammad in Medina to the effective treatment of a larger community leaders in Mecca after the defenders of a besieged from all sides was a small group."

apology pure No trace of historical-critical reading. "As is here abruptly? If there is to be the one sudden bloody end of the Jews from the tribe of Quraiza that were previously not even known as such, it was time to introduce them together with the history. For the prophet has yet been, as we learned previously by Widmer, "brought" the Jewess Safiya, so where do anyway? He does not say you have to first guess. Were the Jews of neighboring tribes to simply "get" that? The circumstances of the man is silent wisely, wants to avoid the impression that the Prophet, the women with the rest pocketed war and attack prey, could be a "libertine" be considered, while a Widmer the man with the "force of 41 cops" as objectively evaluated seriously as any that the victors of history would like to meet. Just as Mohammed revealed to his deeds each with appropriate verses got, the dhimmi is receiving from the service each correct proper interpretation to match the duration of the threat scenario insulted Islam.

abruptly, Muhammad in Medina is now "a statesman." The massacre was successfully completed, the statesman? No, it will come. The Iron Giant, it goes first to mobilize the vast hordes of lust of his men elsewhere. Thomas Widmer impress huge. Grandiose, this "miliante" Statesman. Widmer
"... the act of Medina have been a provocateur who attacks now target the Meccan caravans.

can deny it not, it follows the short list of his victorious battles and lost, without any detail of it committed in the detail of traditional horror, because Mohammed merciless cruel vengeance upon the Meccans who dares to attack him because of his caravan raids ! This can not tolerate Allah, for Allah is kind and just, and who dares to face up to a Muslim killer in the way will be punished by Allah. Allah is on the side of the killer, the avenger caravan robber and for the "humiliation" the Muslims who is trying to become a Muslim. Since an attacker is in a "provocateur", a kind of rebel, a social critic or "resistance fighters"?

far, Widmer has yet to reveal that it was at the outset to Muir report cited the massacre at the root of Quraiza is a large Jewish murders. The method has, for the entire presentation and presentation of the gigantic "statesman" is to to justify the massacre in the sense of Islamic apologetics. After the "humiliated" has defeated the Meccans and bloody revenge, took behead his opponent and went to live with his actions support grazed by other verses from the Koran, he added, according to Widmer only eliminate another Medina internal adversaries. "

Who might that be? An adversary - like Satan - which is exhausting!
Will eliminate the "enemies" such as the Messenger of Allah? Or he can just not teach him to abandon his own beliefs? Not so, the "adversary" is a Jewish tribe, lusting for the possession of the Prophet and his gang. A line that dares to do are not Muslim! The justice-loving Mohammed, probably the materialism of the tribe was such a thorn in the side as Israel and the U.S. left today and how the "Jewish lobby" the Nazis and the "Zionists" the "anti-capitalist" left musing on a solution of the problem in the Middle East. He refers to Sir William Muir has good article they described at the beginning.

The author, which deals with the atrocities of the Muslim Abwiegelung know now why going to the "prophet" against the Jews of Medina, he was already beginning to call in the description of the slaughter by Muir, without the name of the butchered, announced later tell "how it happened" (which is the purpose of the apology article!) He does that now as follows:

"The Jews are the root of the Quraiza not prevent him and stood by prevented by their existence, that he controlled the oasis. "

Just as Israel through its existence, the Muslims control the Middle East free of Jews only? The Jews are to blame for the massacres of Jews. They left the Prophet alone in the massacres of the Meccans? Sounds like a betrayal. What friend were the Jews the Muslims as guilty? The Prophet had it apart not only on their religion, which deviated from the path of Allah, but also on their property. For control of the oasis is in control of the women of the vanquished. It was clear already at the first sections that the author would find good reasons for the massacre of Medina, as well as the understanding of Islamic terror are Know what the reasons are the Palestinians to murder Israeli civilians. The order to slaughter the encircled according Widmer is initially delegated by Mohammed to a judge who had been wounded in combat. So that the pious reader to understand: it was not Mohammed, who gave the order for mass murder. But a "judge" who aimed bad. Oh.

The joy of Judenabschlachten who join in the Prophet, by hand, shares with all his hardworking butchers will be delegated to a man who is not also presented as a horde of bloodthirsty warriors, but to some extent relieved by his wound. No offender, rather a victim. Finally, it was Mohammed by their existence to the Jews in the oasis so humiliated that he was not the repression of Jewish existence could no longer tolerate. 600 men and boys were murdered. The women were captured as a possession of the killer of their families. But that leaves out Widmer. Do not mention it. For this he is still the following:

He of the Orientalist William Muir envisioned process seems a moral point of extreme "

If there is something awesome, then there is the stark adaptation of the author of this grotesque Giganteque to the Islamic apologia, when he has a mass murderer up into the Giants and the pogrom of Medina, Muir describes the realistic to the "process" plays down the "shows" just crass - but for Widmer is not as pronounced when he is so "factual" as he considered. be

But when 600 Jews were massacred, beheaded and thrown into the pit, then that is a "process" of which Widmer assumes that he can contribute to the reader "morally extreme". Somehow exaggerated. Gigantic? And now for the wisdom of the classic propaganda Philistine

. "Of course, morality is always a matter of time"

Why is the prophet and is a timeless example of Sun It's the religion, stupid.
The problem here is less the Prophet as his willing apologist. The Prophet would not be the problem if it were not so many leaders admirer, the hyping him for "Giant." Get out in Widmer's explanation of the world:

"The seventh-century Arabia has no law prisoners. And no prisons. "

Aha. Not the prophet, but the seventh-century Arabia. There's no prisons, that's why you must cut off the heads of the prisoners, that's just a constraint, not sadism. No lust for heads. It must lie on the si8ebten century Arabia. There is something, for so he comes, the drum Prophet.U nd the Quran remains unchanged to this day. Where to long Prisons in Arabia has the best torture prisons in the world, but the joy of heads is the faithful prophets have not passed, or why so much beheading in front of the camera in Arabia in the present century?

for the mass atrocities of the brutal nature of the leader Muhammad is not responsible, who commands, or the perpetrators who follow him, no, it's just time. All men abomination of history perpetrated by the "time". With the men who perpetrate it with pleasure, they have to do anything. Just as the terrorists have nothing to do with the terror that comes, according to new findings of the NZZ, it has by Bernard Lewis (Oh Ach), from the West and its totalitarianism, not by the representatives of the Eastern Religionsdespotien.

The giant of religious terror now, because in the seventh century Arabia were no prisons, a very special reason, the Jews of Medina, who had not attacked him leave, dead to escape from the boiler. Because, as explained Widmer

"of the isolated losers, which one can be free to come back in a strong alliance."

A truly valuable statement on the massacre of the victors to the vanquished. The danger comes from the attacked and massacred. The attack on the unarmed and the massacre of Raid is on Muslim-only self-defense. The Jewish tribe Quraiza, who was not from warrior tribes such as the followers of Muhammad would than words can "come back in the network"? Where? At his homes? The plunder the Muslims wanted. Why this had to be encircled tribe, who had not fought the Muslims, actually: this aaaO still, for now only this? Because he did not voluntarily published his property to the Mohammelbande? Because he did not give up their faith to the God to follow Muhammad? Widmer twisted things specifically to the Jewish Butcher of Medina in conjunction with today's ally against Israel from all his bloody deeds whitewash, so that what is morally crass, less blatantly appear from another perspective, considered, namely the Muslims themselves, to the seventh century to today.

From "in the composite return" at best could be any question in the previous battle of Badr, where the merciful Allah had exercised and not a spark of mercy for the vanquished, who were of course drawn out against the "prophet" because he their caravans attacked and their people killed. Had they not reason to drag this man out of circulation? What danger is to be considered by the Jews, the slaughter Widmer so beautiful in connection with bringing the alleged need for to kill prisoners, because they otherwise could fight back - and why they had to be taken for? Because Mohammed was interested in their olive groves. Oil interests?

As in the known Muselmanenlogik always the victims of terrorism are to blame for the terror, Widmann makes this logic for simplicity as its own, and explains why he, the prophet of a higher vantage point than the moral, the Jews could not simply let them live. Apologists are never at a loss for an explanation of religious terror. N This is the nature of terror. It supplies are always with justification. Gigantic. Because of the terror itself is the reason for the respect due him and the West ahead of hastening contrary brings ..
"Muhammad is acting as a real politician of his era"

too could be from the Islamic fanatics Küng. The giant, announced the so grandiose messages is not only a thirsting for truth and justice, defender of a poor little weak group, it is also a statesman and a real politician who knows what the right time to do is to protect the Muslims against injustice to avert and humiliation, which means the existence of the Jewish race. Such men have to act and know how. Another idea:

. "A few critics have to die"

So? What then? Die all. The readers want to know like what the critics had to die for. Was it perhaps in the seventh-century Arabia a certain critic's disease, which led to the death? The same, suffered from Theo van Gogh?

Under these critics, there was also a critic, a poet who did very different things to the language as a creative imagining of Prophet Montgomery Watt. Her name was Asma, and had as the prophet of the "half Jews" and poet al Ashraf be slaughtered after the had been lured into an ambush with the full approval of the Prophet, was Asma not be intimidated as the servile men pack of today's media, according to the murder of van Gogh rows with the head down to the ground before going to Islam and always servile to the prophet's beard rumstreichen, no, she continued to write, they are not silent, but they lost their lives. On behalf of Muhammad was pregnant when she was just brutally slaughtered a child to breastfeed. The Prophet was very pleased. In Widmer ie on Swiss neutrality "had to die a few critics."

Why, he should explain why they die "had.." If they were perhaps "in combination" come back if he can not have been slaughtered? While the Swiss press, the composite bow in front of a religious guise Cult of violence, there were even then seems's always some critics, who had the courage not to crawl in front of the giants on the floor.

over the slaughter of the poetess Asma bint Marwan and critic of the man from the Zurich men's house not a word loses. As some readers may even get slaughtered doubts about the huge size of the force beweihräucherten prophet, pregnant women and helpless men left. Widmer thinks this is immaterial to necessity. The incense penetrates thick and dense from the men's house.

"In the tough approach of Muhammad against the Jews, his disappointment showing on them."
Let's
Translate to this incense to clear something: In the harsh actions of the Nazis towards the Jews, their disappointment show through. That's what happens when the Jews are always so disappointing and do not stand by their friends! If they are the opponents of the Nazis already, then it's customary not to let them escape, otherwise they get back together with the murdered man. It is usually the case with pogrom. Not only then.

Widmer turns out to be giant Swiss Beautiful Liar on the shoulders of his men's house of world-week format. Even today, Jews in Israel so disappointing for the UN, which they can not stand the so-called Menaschenrechtsrat in the notorious Condemnations of Israel

"He had to find in Medina, which they thought of his prophecy little or nothing"!

Yes what should we make of it! Can Mr Widmer might explain the closer? Now it is piquant:

. "According to their own teaching it the way it is, that they are the chosen people through which God alone reveals himself to men"

The small difference to Allah that the Jews were not the Zwangsjudaisierung all non-Jews aspire to is not familiar with Widmer. It's a fact that the Jews are not Muslims want to be even much want to be forced to Widmer from which the legitimacy of the latter to derive the murder of the Jews of Medina seems in any case, he tried every means to qualify the massacre. Where in this reading, the Jews are to blame themselves, because they are the God of the Messenger of Allah not like it, holds also for the best of all possible prophet. perhaps you want the Muslims to keep the best people in the world, all other than to fight? The prophet says his apologist, now give the "courting the Jews" on, he changes now two traditions: first, is now not fasted on Yom Kippur, but in Ramadan, and secondly, the direction of Mecca is prayed not to Jerusalem . The Kaaba gets missed a biblical source of Mohammed, who explained their cult as an Abrahamic, which he occupied the progenitor of the Jews for the Muslims and true God of the Muslims to the DENR only chooses, the faith of Jews and Christians had been falsified. In Widmer called the A brilliant maneuver. Anyone who does not follow, is beheaded.

A giant on the shoulders of so many religious police in Switzerland may not be from crude critics and unbelievers into question. Biedermann's admiration for the murderers in the order of Allah has no limits. Because his killings are so common. And because the violence of the conquest of religion is a Success Story Sun Even Hitler is in the Muslim World still a giant. There, the Shoah is a success story.

"Islam gaining total independence from Judaism," he writes

fascinated by the maneuvers of the war Horde leader. If the success story begins with the massacre of Jews and still leads to terror against Jews, then of course that is extremely impressive and commanding respect. Just like the Frauenvermummung. Total independence of Islam. Just strange that he did not its independence was enough, and he the independence of all other religions constant threat from its origin. But know this would have to Widmer, the success story of dhimmitude. Another Trouvaille:

629, he draws as a pilgrim with 2,000 followers in Mecca, whose residents have evacuated voluntarily for three days the city.

This one has just imagine live! The Meccans seemed to know the "pilgrimage" to so, why they preferred to evacuate the city "voluntarily" when he arrived with his hordes, they would probably not be so voluntary encircled by the massive onslaught as the Jews of Medina. An end to the courtship, and is not willing, then takes the giant force.

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Anti Freezing Pokemon Heart Gold

Dhimensionen the Dhimmköpfe

Kuffar Stauffer in dialogue with Mullah Blancho

"Is there violent Muslims in the Switzerland asks "the NZZ am Sunday, 27/08/2006 naive.

The violence by Muslims against countless forced married women in Switzerland is obviously not as violent, but as a religion. The Basel journalist Beat Stauffer writes here about the Islamists Nicholas Blancho Bieler, one in 2006 on the occasion of the Muslim demonstration in front of the parliament building against the press freedom in Denmark was able to get a good picture. This convert, the wife has the treatment program of the Koran, a figment of a puerile and brutal macho mentality, it made sense as the famous, from BaZ as a great thinker praised Muslim Ramadan's brother, was as Pubertand 16-Islamist, learned Arabic, to read the Koran, can and wants to study law in Switzerland.

He the western to the expression and press freedom-looking Muslim demonstration organized in front of the parliament buildings during the cartoon crisis, where phrases like religion goes against democracy was on the banners, and is consistent Sharia openly about the Swiss law, an excellent conditions for the coming law degree in Switzerland. Where? With whom? at Al Bazhar? In Fribourg, where already came from the tuition of Dr. Ramadan?

Would entered this Islamist as a Holocaust denier to the public, he could not so easily read history Begin unless he would turn into with Prof. circle as a specialist in human rights. For example, peaceful Islamic Jew treatment.

Then the man but only as a secondary matter agrees with the abolition of the Sharia law by the only valid and all its barbarities against women, he enjoys the goodwill of the Schariakompatiblen Swiss jurisprudence. For lack of ability to earn an academic diploma, could find Schulze Professor in Berne and Geneva and to help in Professor Ziegler Friedli as second-and third-party verifiers may also Prof. Jositsch of the SP?

As opponents of the initiative submitted by women custody for sexual recidivists who does not wish also that untherapierbare offenders are locked up effectively, he might have a sense of the Islamic understanding of the law, to give the man all the violence on women and children including the right to rape the wife and child rape, legalized child marriage and the right and Fraueneinsperrung without time limits, legal under Sharia law, life imprisonment. This law requires sexual assault victims instead of perpetrators are locked away for more Tatausübung undisturbed. When lawyers left the pious man can build on understanding of his views.

The article in the NZZ am Sunday, 27/08/2006 is a pattern of politically correct dhimmitude against a militant Islam agent. A few Müsterchen for the head of the dhimmis hesitate before Talib of Bern, he would "understand" by all means follow.

is to this end Stauffer is much stupider than a dhimmi must be, and acts as if he did not understand what represents the Schariajurist clear and admits - the journalist knows the Sharia is not wisely prefer to be as accurate and also provides specifically not a single question about their barbaric rules.

The journalist would not seem that the future will be very disturbed Schariajurist in his project of Swiss law enrichment. Beat Stauffer respects this project, he also believes it is neither cheap nor illegal. Cheap, he finds it just that someone is laughing at the guys and their accomplices, makes it interviewed in all seriousness and with respect.

"The pictures of the praying Muslims before the Federal House (the slogans on the banners of" praying Muslims, "he wisely not) ensured irritation" Notes Stauffer fixed discrete. With whom? For those who know what plan the Muslims before the House of Parliament, they provided no means for irritation, but for the confirmation of what we know. "However, we do not know that from the Swiss press, which conjures the image of a different Islam than that which presents itself as the person he is. The NZZ am Sonntag "is irritated"? Why not simply say, "This is against our constitution, you know that?" Or:

"Why do you want to study a right that they do not recognize? "

" frown caused even those statements that are made a fighting Blancho. If in doubt, the Sharia stand for him to Swiss law, let the young Muslim activist announced " -

This is the correct Swiss dialect for Islamofascists: " of young Muslim activists. "

A militant Blancho, articulated before the dhimmi already without a fight is before the Blancho, the course lays the cards on the table is not blank, say something. Not even a proper "frown", manifests with the the extremely favorable, not the least bit critical interviewer only a slight irritation of the pleasure of the Democrats in the demonstration against democracy, but not so that the "militant Blancho" that the journalists as would like to understand, irritated in any way.

"And what concerns the jihad
, reported on it in an effort to understand the promising young Blancho also, so what is an effort in the belief understanding, " he was" not yet on the level. "To take him to the satisfaction of"

Stauffer is also not yet on the level, the faith of the young man can imagine the satisfaction, but he struggles to:

"These comments, so Blancho declared today" (and Stauffer reflect an assumption by him, without him to get through an irritating question from the Islamic concept of) him much trouble would have brought. "

Is that frown so annoying? Or what trouble it might have been because the journalist of this snow-white Blancho not brings.

"blame the media were, which would have given the statements shortened" (One was called like this:... Religion is for democracy in its integrity, the journalist is so discreet that cite just do not know they could NZZ . Sunday readers confuse it this sham is also not a bit cheap, the Happy is in fact understood in the enviable position, or not at all understand wanting to whom he interviewed and what the man says, says Stauffer..

"But It is an almost impossible task, the Islamic understanding of this Bieler converts illuminate closer. "

This is indeed an impossible task when you yourself had no understanding of Islam has, which would enable one to understand the clear statements of dubious Jus candidates than what they are. They are to be understood as easily.

"Blancho says there is only" one Islam "and he simply followed" the principles of Islam. "


What it should not be understood? Blancho is absolutely right, there is only one Islam, but a Koran, only a prophet. Or is there more of them? Only the very stupid dhimmis do not understand that, and Beat Stauffer is either stupid or has in Ernst has set his mind that it is not Islam, not even one, but no, and that it is peaceful, tolerant and moderate when he was only so understand how you want. And is that illuminate hard to correct. For where there are such Islam?

grotesque scene in which attempts a dhimmi with the greatest effort, a real Islamists another Islam to dense than the one he represents openly and it in reality there, and there is no other than the way of Allah as the Qur'an says and the Prophet, and woe to him does not follow, and the Islamist without ifs or buts said as the one, the true, the real existing Islam.

Only Stauffer will not admit, that the Muslims think Islam is no other than Islam, even if Christopher does not know who has already Dhimmensionen of comedy that might make us forget that there is nothing to laugh about in Islam.

"The ideal would be the Islamic state" . O-Ton convert Blancho.

Stauffer, who is in his self-ignorance of Islam completely helpless in the face of Jihad revelations from the puerile Bieler young macho brain that wants to miss all the women in Switzerland, the Sharia as the ideal single law as soon as he could only and ready the land for the admission, this well-intentioned journalist who does not know how to deal with the Schariarechtsmenschen is because its a clear vision of Islamic law not to his own firm projects fit the verdhimmten readers his ideal of a not really existing, but in the head of kuffar ghost of Islamic vorzusetzen want this to get his ideal of the converts also confirmed.

short, Stauffer, the dogmas of the Islamic faith West as apologetic thinking dictation has been in the head set, which is not only not an Islam there and he is second, completely different feel than any of his faithful, who understand him, of course, all wrong, if they take the Koran at the unchanging divine word, but that the Koran should be any interpretations. The dhimmis know him that is better than the Al Azhar. And Islamic law as the student. The convert from Biel has been expressed over the BaZ very clear and said what he advocates:

The ideal would be the Islamic state . The Swiss caliphate of course. But Stauffer kuffar understand it will not. He introduces himself stupid. And the readers sold for even more stupid.

recommended for this purpose it is to know the Koran does not even mention at all, much less quoted, - after which the death penalty, as the film Submission - has meant him so if you understand him as the prophet and often bloody lead by example in those who did not would follow. As he executed on Theo van Gogh was exemplified and all other victims of Islam, the dead and the living threatened.

The interviewer is determined to keep Islam for anything other than his faith. For the purposes of the western Islamic believers, the dhimmis who follow the dictates of tolerance of the media, showing that Islam is not firstly, and secondly there is a peaceful and tolerant.

The reinterpretation of reality by means of Newspeak takes over in such bizarre forms as the efforts of a well-intentioned journalists to "understand" what was said from the Ummabold Biel yet clear what the kuffar but wants to understand not go away. The Islamist knows his Koran and the Sharia. This is embarrassing for the dhimmis who want to know it better than the Muslims carry it with them all their means in mind.

It is easy to understand. But, the Dhimmkopf taken it into his head that everything is completely different than the Koran says, and believes the faithful. He wants his readers prefer to bring the "young Muslim activists' understanding close as one who has not his Islam understood quite sure if he was not so" interpreted "as befits the dhimmis and still not see the situation (!) to realize its full faith and ....

But by the Swiss as favorably with kid gloves touched "young Muslim activist" (!) with the sexual fascist by the violent messages of the prophets dull steamy Pubertandenfantasien in the head, the right to the murderous beatings primates activities that legitimizes the Koran against women, against infidels, against apostates, Jews and Christians and Atheists, has been illuminated at 16, this Swiss Musterexemplärchen from the Koranic school, where you can learn the wife beating strictly according to regulations, makes it to his "understanding" struggling in understanding readiness met questioner not so easy. For answers Blancho not like Beat Stauffer imagines the ideal Islam.

The tries hard not to have the Muslim Brotherhood understood, but the Jihad is now sometimes exhausting, and the Promising males from Biel, was ready already in puberty 16 for the message of Fraueneinsperrer that will please the mini macho so very, all unripe fruits, whose Mulikultimist the mature sexual fascist bullshit flourishes, this lined with Koranic violence-against-women legislation boys brain says Biederman, who wants to understand killed croak not said what the lad from Biel recently, and rather against his better its totally clear "understanding of Islam" from the "ideal state" for "v age ", explains that his original Muslim understanding of Islam is not vague, but completely adequate Koran.

The " young Muslim activist " knows exactly how to deal with the kuffar. As long as the Muslims are still in the minority, they are not what you do, did, or has in mind. It is explained as the ongoing terrorist attacks for "unislamlische activities" and also knows well the author of Islam: the kuffar namely that caused, according to the "young Muslim activists" the terrorist acts and committed. All right. Clear to all who know that Islan not mean peace but submission.

best understanding of Islam: The Muslims are murdered by the fault that they did not follow the way of Allah. Stauffer, the Koran, the logic does not seem so familiar, is irritated thereat. Because of the Kuffar understood not know who he is for the Muslim Brotherhood: a dhimmi in the service of the true real single Islam, has to follow the way of Allah who does not want to suffer the punishment of Allah ... - Stauffer or knows a different Koran than the real world?
The grotesque comedy is ripe. Proposal of Pattern Interview:


dialogue with Blancho blanc

Muslim brother


The ideal would be an Islamic state.

Kuffar:

I do not understand. Should Switzerland be a caliphate?

Muslim brother

I said, for the Dschiad I am not yet ripe.

Kuffar:

"Oh but you were kind enough to explain to Mr Muslim activist us how you think that the jihad for which you do not feel ready? Do you think we still need to access more funding under the arms? Do you feel might be excluded by us in Biel? What could we do for you, activist? Tell us, please, we want to understand so much. You know how much we have your Respect faith "

brother activist


. I tell you already that I just do what is in the Koran. You know the Koran does not appear, you stupid kuffar, this is because you are one of the monkeys and pigs and in a state of ignorance is that is not condoned by Allah "

Kuffar:

." Forgive Please You mean disrespect, I did not want to offend, but I do not understand you right. But Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance. I do not want you to interpret it wrong, it is always on the interpretation of the Koran for Muslims to even any Interpret. You know that there is no real-peaceful jihad, the history of Islam is indeed a story of peace and tolerance, which has spread so peaceful and still by Israel and the American crusaders severely disturbed world peace with his own peaceful means to spread everywhere investigated. Have I misunderstood, Mr peace activist? "

pious brother

." Yes, Islam is peace "

Kuffar:

" Exactly. As you said, yes, Islam is a peaceful tolerant religion, but as you only get to the jihad, it is not un-Islamic? Were you not in the Quran lessons taught that the true Islamic Jihad from scratch is peaceful? The Prophet has even preached peace with all men, especially the Jews who did not understand but ...

pious brother grumpy: Follow

If the unbelievers in the way of Allah and not oppose Islam, and remain peaceful, especially the women and obey their husbands - you understand me safe ....

Kuffar:


Certainly, you are as a future lawyer even better than I know how to treat women properly, the Swiss, already frère Tariq since the necessary turnout model for us found zuammen with brother Ziegler and Schulze (your supervisor, may I ask?) I will, of course, you overdo it is not with the executions, in Switzerland, we initially to more moderate forms of Sharia law, it would be enough if you we say lower the age for marriage at 11, and increase the execution age something, not like in Tehran - I'm thinking, Mrs Calmy-Rey could develop a human form of Hududstrafen for women in Geneva, we are an open Switzerland, or how do you think Mr. activist, I would have understood it so ..

Frommer brother

Islamic peace is a genuine peace. A Peace without Kuffar, you understand me?

Kuffar:


Mr. activist, I do not quite understand, do you think that we are not allowed to participate in your peace?

Frommer brother grumbles something unintelligible.

Kuffar:
"how you felt? I still do not understand, you express yourself a little vague.

pious brother r, decidedly:

I said, true peace. Without dhimmis. No more infidels, they must be eliminated wherever they are found. Of course, once we do have the necessary facilities. Do you still do not know you are really so slow-witted, you stupid infidel! I try hard all the time you explain what is going on and try bottomless Dhimmkopf me honey to lubricate the beard and pretend as if this so hard to understand when you do not understand what I say. What do we have to do no ch until you run down what is being played you hard of hearing kuffar. Do we perhaps have the Houses of Parliament for the first blow before it dawns on people like you that we have all along said and lead by example! Religion comes before democracy, you do not understand this about? Present you with our current activities do not they? How many samples you want faith as yet, Monkey! Do not you know that the infidels are animals? We do what we can to show you who we are, but I t understand it is not easy to understand you, I t is that problem, not wi r. Press W e are clearly and distinctly, but they simply lack the necessary comprehension!

Kuffar:

No, no, I have understood you so! I would like to understand so much so, you understand, but I am not sure why you think that behind the activities in New York and Madrid and London are not Muslims, but ..

pious brother

I do not believe it! The believe I t! It is you, stupid! We say that we believe this so he S and believe its the same. They will think you are to blame and not us for what you get it "terror" call?

Kuffar:

Oh, please, no, I did not even speak of terror, I mean it, I've said a word about democracy, I will not offend, I just said that these activities - yes I think so, that we take in the West is a great complicity, we have the religion of peace and tolerance, respect for too little! Even the Swiss Crusades - but we change this, the NZZ is among them, we drive out this profanity. We will improve even more in the way of Allah. Allah is so kind and just, if you only really understand. Allah is a matter of interpretation-
Muslim activist snarls something under his breath:

W hat as they say??

Kuffar:

thought like you? I did not understand you correctly, it sounded so vague, you might think that we need to show more respect for you? I will do my best, I am working hard to fight me!

Muslim activist

The real jihad means fighting yourself, you have to do a real jihad against them! The other left Us, of which you understand nothing. They can not even Arabic.

Kuffar:


No, I'm really sorry. but I could learn maybe we could publish the BAZ and the NZZ in Arabic, when you said ...

pious brother

not necessary, it is in Swiss dialect. We have plenty of methods with which we make our intentions known, not the kuffar have to learn Arabic, nonsense. They have to not listen to our mosques. It is sufficient to teach their wives to house the necessary respect for us, at least you have understood?

Kuffar:


course. Understand. If it's nothing more. To this end we have the SP and the SVP and the churches and dialogue.

Muslim:

Fiddlesticks. Dialogue is one of the stupidest Dhimmiideen. W e do not need dialogue. With it Allah guides no dialogue, you understand that? Allah is not elected democratically.

Dhimmi:

We have also something in the Preamble to the Constitution, we could understand each other but

Frommer brother

Let the inside. The use we can, we will translate it just right. It must, of course, hot Allahu akbar.

Kuffar:

So we should learn Arabic?

Frommer brother

Make us any trouble, there's always a lot of trouble with you, if we try to explain something. As we said in Bern on the federal court: we do not need your democracy on Swiss still in Arabic, we need them at all, if you want to finally understand the times. In the House of Peace, there are no more disbelievers. No Arabic speakers and talk to us after the beard. You should not imagine that we respect that! And now you kindly respect us so that you understand at least what we Tell you a long time.

Kuffar:

I admit that I've been a crusader, I also apologize for it, but -

Frommer brother (laughs for the first time):

you? A crusader? To do this, have not got it, my dear. Since they overestimate themselves.

Kuffar:

"What would they really think that you will soon start at the University of Bern law degree, finally tell young jihadists in Europe if they could do this?
(This idea is not mine, is the original! The Kuffar makes so .. his idea!)

pious brother


"I would tell them that they should deal more intensively with Islam"
(the original sound Blancho)

Kuffar:

Mr. activist, I'm only one stupid kuffar who knows the Koran, but what you find in the table for as your suitcase?

(Kuffar is with bows backwards out the door, crosses himself reflexively)

pious brother


you do not need to cross themselves! Tearing you time your ass up, you miserable Dhimmi! And you finally understand who we are! We do not let ill- Actions carried away, we know that is exactly what we do, where and when. You should also know slow!

************************************************ ************

And to conclude with a quotation from the Swiss live Wohlfülleben:
For Stéphane Lathion (co-author on behalf of the Swiss Federal Commission for Foreigners authored study on Muslims in Switzerland in September 2005 that only marginal reference to the phenomenon of radicalization of young Islamists in Switzerland comes in, as the noted 27th 8:06 NZZ) is clear:
that the risk of radicalization of young Muslims in Switzerland is much lower than in neighboring countries. The reason he looks in the better socio-economic conditions and the more relaxed political climate. Crucial for the future is, however, the strategy towards the Muslim minority would be taken. We must create a climate of trust so that the Muslims feel comfortable and denounce its own initiative any radicals in their ranks, says Lathion. If
Lathion says that, then it must surely agree. The Muslims must feel comfortable with us, so they do not make terror. And what do the Muslims in order to feel good with us? Perhaps the abandonment of their Islamic law? Or, you owe them the recognition of the Sharia, so that also feel very comfortable with us? If forced marriage would be prohibited or punished would be effective, the Muslims are probably not even feel this way. Drum, the Federal Council in its wisdom, made sure that the Islamic Frauenversklaver feel good and also rejected the study of forced marriages in Switzerland. And the Asylum Appeals Commission has made with its recognition of marriage to Schariarecht for a very special feeling of wellbeing of Muslims in Switzerland. Would the men's rights of the Muslim men to be seriously, the men Lathion and brother Christopher would probably not feel comfortable way in Switzerland. Questions Stauffacher the interior.

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Burning In Feet After Bath

kuffar in coffee Wed Ramadan

Kuffar over coffee with Ramadan

or La raison dans l'islam


Ramadan and his Swiss believers among the educated

A comment on the meeting with the magazine Begley Ramadan

Regine van Cleeve

(ad Tariq Ramadan, presented by one of his Swiss admirer of the magazine BaZ http://www.dasmagazin.ch/magazin/magazin_artikel.php?ID=3T6BSM)

recommendation for the introduction of the world as the interview week with Tariq Ramadan :
"You are an arrogant man."
http://www.weltwoche.ch/artikel/?AssetID=9305&CategoryID=62

The only so far in Switzerland, in which the Islamic people has been felt on the tooth.

Begley is not arrogant person. Tariq Ramadan is the "Switzerland's most important thinkers in the world," it says there, "although it hardly a" know. "Who is the man," asks Martin Begley, although the ought to know enough at least since the interview in the World Week, which was critical to some extent as the said Baz milieu, and the Ramadan so angry was that he interview broke off. All too familiar with the Western rules of free speech seems to be the most important Swiss philosopher yet, the more comfortable in the Dhimmimedien felt than in the still regimented. Perhaps
to this violation of Islamic feelings of disrespect by the World Week irreparable, Begley has the BaZ Tagi magazine now taken Ramadan, so we can get the true picture. We are always delighted when another Swiss journalist discovered the great thinkers of Ramadan, which we have heard so much .... Yes what Mr. Ramadan is thinking now? the reconciliation of the Muslim religion with the European rule of law:

The message of this "Muslim Globetrotters" ("L'Hebdo") is the "Euro-Islam". Who thought of that because Islam is irreconcilably opposed to the Western law has never known Mr. Begley. The poses a Ramadan, with which the West is to reconcile. His criticism of Begley's a little suspicious, because the threat so as Hirsi Ali "the rule of law," we would like to reconcile with the Ramadan (the Schariarechtsstaat). (See Begley in an interview with Hirsi Ali, where is here because the rule of law *?)

Begley Ramadan is no questions that would irritate him, for Begley is not even Sarkozy.

__________________

* Note Martin Begley said Hirsi Ali (magazine 37/06), whether it is "promising" is when "a Apostates "on the need for reform of Islam write back Ali asks:
." Slave must have been one to criticize the slave trade?
The issue of the magazine was so insidious as the usual Wadenbeisserei the yelper against Islam critic: Have they personally experienced what they write, they are not "objective." If they have not seen anything myself, what they write, they do not know what they are talking. Have they explored it scientifically, is their method incorrectly, etc. (See NZZ Ammann against Kelek.)
__________________________________

Begley: "He wanted, says Ramadan, Muslims in Europe make European citizens of Muslim faith. "

Now the Muslims in Europe are indeed already mostly Europeans, but that they are not infidels, we still do not know. The young Muslims were "fascinated by the first Muslim media star, who is sitting with ministers and scholars at the same table (if it is left rvc) and also cut on the Sharia speaks like the concept of truth in Nietzsche, but preferably about the Prophet." ( About the latter we learn from Begley but unfortunately nothing seems ...)

Even Mr. Begley to be fascinated by the moratorium has indeed something fascinating for the BaZ environment. Why he has so taken with him, he wanted to meet the fascinating person that you thought you sufficiently to know from the duel with Sarkozy, but Beglinger it can not be assumed to be allowed to sit with the man at one table:

" In his native city of Geneva would be Tariq Ramadan immediately recognized and even in Paris, since he sat down in the fall of 2003, seven million viewers, with Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy on French television. But in the narrow café in London where we meet for a two-hour conversation in the midst of Christians, Sikhs and Muslims, it seems no one noticed, even though his picture last July, shortly after the London attacks, emblazoned on the front page of the "Sun". The newspaper looked like a wanted poster, and so it was meant. "

But what is the meaning of confidential meeting for Begley? Although we have never seen on a wanted poster, but who knows, maybe is not the indirect promotion of the "most important thinker of Switzerland as harmless as it does?

was "This" militant Muslim professor "the acceptable face of terror to impressionable young Muslims" and "dangerous." Than many preachers of hate, the tabloid warned his audience of millions. This Swiss, "because of contacts with terrorists" do not travel to the U.S. may belong also banished from England. "

We now know since the interview with Hirsi Ali Begley, Begley that keeps the Islamists from the exile of democracy is a threat to the rule of law.

"The call was in vain. Only days later, Tariq Ramadan was in London a lecture on Islam and the West - under the patronage of Scotland Yard. The London police chief Ramadan was explicitly protected. "

It was also the London police, who declared that he can do nothing against a Muslim anti-Jewish demonstration in Trafalgar Square, was called in to destroy Israel. The mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, took the rabble-rouser expressly protection. Ramadan, however, the adviser and protege of the Prime Minister, who famously holds the Koran for the most advanced book that he knows. (What Blair is the former German Federal President Lübke proves equal, which fell as you give him a book to have said he already had one.) Ramadan advice now Blair by the rules of the most advanced book in the world:

short "on it he summoned none other than Tony Blair in a commission to advise his government on how to keep young Muslims from sliding into terror and radicalism. Similar discussions had already Ramadan with the Dutch Prime Minister Balkenende, was in the land of the filmmaker Theo van Gogh slaughtered in November 2004 by a Muslim was, was made in retaliation for a sharp-Islam film, the Van Gogh with politician Ayaan Hirsi Ali. "

Begley holds the Quran quotes from the writer of the film Submission for sharp criticism of Islam? "Yes, what now?" He asks.

"Is the man a friend of terrorists and a threat to democracy, as its opponents call especially in France? Or one of the "100 most important thinkers of the 21st Century "," Time Magazine has chosen "" to him and the U.S. for its part seems to hold the BaZ ... (The second most important is probably Hans Saner, just be that the messages not yet been proclaimed from the minaret, but it is already time for the construction of minarets to help the less important thinkers to fame.)

Although Begley therefore not yet know who the man is, he meets in London in the café, he knows for sure, that "teaches that Tariq Ramadan since last autumn as a visiting professor at Oxford. There, he thought, "Lectures on Usul al-fiqh, the fundamentals of Islamic law."

Well, since you can know who is the man, or knows of Mr. Begley not the foundations of Islamic law, perhaps? They are not so difficult to understand, one must just read a little about the words and deeds of the Prophet, then you have it, the basics. And would have to actually know that they are incompatible with the basic laws of democracies. But the BaZ Magaziner, the do not know and wants to leave the explanation of Mr. Ramadan, which is a real rule of law with the right Islam and all its true believers. Because where would the rule of law, if it were up to Hirsi Ali!

know him outside of Geneva in Switzerland, but hardly anyone says Beglinger, or confuse you with Tariq Hani, "yet his notorious brother, who made himself as a defender of stoning to death of it." The needs are still fascinating.

"but had no other Swiss", white Beglinger, "by Roger Federer apart," had "the world's media in recent decades as more reports on Tariq Ramadan." And the city BaZ medium, which impressed the mighty man. The man was "found on all channels. No fewer than five books have been published in France since 2000 about him, among which two wild settlements with the supposedly duplicitous preachers of aggressive Islamism. A sixth book is published in the coming months, probably the first sober and well-researched biography of Ramadan, written by French journalist Ian Hamel. "(Note March 07: One more news about the Prophet as a role model has just been added)

since we are fully drawn. Also in the BaZ there should be a Mr. Hamel yes, but he writes with two mm, such as mutton, which is not found at all world channels, but was responsible for all the gossip columns in Basel. Whether he might have written the biography of Ramadan secretly?

What Mr. Begley makes us very curious but these are the two "wild statements", whose titles and authors, he tells us, unfortunately, as Ramadan had dissuaded him from it and the BaZ editors. For this we learn that it is except for one type BaZ Hamel, everything about life has collected from Ramadan. And have found no support for connections to terrorist Oranisationen of his research. We need to go no further than the compounds that Ramadan has already with his work to upgrade the Islamic ghettos. The manual of terror called the Koran and the daily terror against women is called Sharia, what more could you want? But since the terror against women and for Begley is not a terrorist, you remain the "proof" of course, guilty. The religious terrorism is not usually as a terrorist when there is no explosive in the game, but Fox and the butcher's knife and the honor killers.

For Ramadan not only has no objection in principle against stoning, but is also an advocate of hitting women, but then asks Mr. Begley does not, he would not want to spoil the good atmosphere in the café, or if Mr tune Ramadan and left the table on which one agrees so well in the democratic Islam, as in the Islamic democracy. Finally, this is not a World Week interview. For the purpose of building confidence Begley quotes now January Hamel, who in turn quotes a French official as follows:

"I never had knowledge of any connections of Ramadan with a radical organization. And common sense tells me that he would be subject to an entry barrier, if we knew of such compounds. "

The same was explained to him the Swiss news service that had also been a thorough exchange with Ramadan, tells Begley.
Now if that is so - the hats Hamel said, then it must surely agree. Maybe ask one more time in Basel Begley Mr. Hammel to who knows maybe even the one and others to contribute from his gossip columns. We also do not doubt that what Mr. Hamel has found out to Mr. Ramadan, that is nothing suspicious. Because he is looking in the wrong place. He did not need to penetrate Swiss news service, reading the Koran would have been enough, yes. But the trust in these news groups ran no one, right?. These are the basics of the law that Ramadan teaches. And Hirsi Ali has quoted from it for a screenplay. But the director was killed on the instructions of the Quran.

Ramadan is regarded not only as a protégé of Ziegler and Co in the Swiss left-wing circles, he should also get a professorship at the Catholic Notre Dame University in Indiana, which was the alliance of Islam, left, and church would be complete. Only well known that nothing was out of it, because the United States gave him no entry permit. It was true, as Begley to report white, to "violent protests in the United States against the stifling of academic freedom," which can also appear in Switzerland to be understood as Ramadan, where Voltaire performances No chance - freedom of expression on the ground, have bedeubt since the Ziegler accomplices them. The protests against the "curtailment of academic freedom" were probably from those circles that had been mobilized against a host of Jewish historian Bat Ye'or seminar at the University of Georgetown without the Rector would have defended against harassment by the Islamic side was as experienced www.secularislam.org to be> in the discussion forum years ago.

your Swiss counterparts are those of friends who tried in the court case against the Jews Frank Luebke, the viewers with brute force to prevent the observation of the trial. Something interesting in the magazine environment but not. After all, there are now two authors referred to have solved the brother Tariq: Caroline Fourest (Brother Tariq) and Lionel Favrot (Tariq Ramadan dévoilé). Whether the "wild statements" should be, which opposes Beglinger the first "sober" Ramadan's biography of Jan Hamel? As an example of quasi. For what is a genuine followers of the prophetic role model that is based entirely sober on the model according to the views of the model. As Ramadan is oriented as in his dissertation by the Geneva Uniiversiät rejected propaganda written to his grandfather al Banna hate. Except that Mr. Begley did not also oriented, neither sober nor otherwise. Ramadan and it has probably been told by the Prophet, about whom he speaks loudly Begley prefers.

No word about the good words and deeds? Why not? If you go after London, to meet the most important Swiss thinker, you should still bring home something from his favorite subject with and the expectant reader, know the Ramadan still not at all to enrich a few Müsterchen from the life of the Prophet, so they share in the revelations from the London Café can. Who was he? Already a Thomas Widmer in the world week we tried to lead the Prophet in all his gigantic size in mind, without us, but quite convincing to. Now we would like to hear of Mr. Begley, what should it be the Giants in this man? But he is silent as to do so. He would not want that the humanitarian values of Islam put an end to him, understandably.

Of all suspicion of terrorism, there remains nothing, "says Ian Hamel, having combed through Ramadan's books and articles and he also observed repeatedly in his appearances on stage in France." (And Mr. Hamel has forgotten to comb through the Koran.) Religious Terror Sharia against women is not a terrorist for the master race. calm Begley knows:
"Tariq Ramadan attacks in New York has also openly condemned as those in Madrid, Bali and London. "

who wanted him there any close to the model of Islamic terrorists and religious terror suspect? Begley report even know that Ramadan at the "destruction of Israel" hold on (at the meeting in the café.) And say: ". Nothing in Islam can legitimize anti-Semitism or xenophobia"

We take note with interest that the Koran "Nothing "in Islam.
that Ramadan's grandfather and father of the 20 Islamists Century ", which to this day as a" thought leader is revered by Islamist terror groups between Sudan and Afghanistan, "in the thesis of the grandson is an honor rescue should know, that makes for Begley not particularly suspicious to stand close to the Muslim Brotherhood to be even one. He knows that the small Al-Banna "painful decades in political exile" had to spend.

from the painful decades of Islam persecuted, the way other than Ramadan and Beglinger may not be open to see in a coffee shop, if there are too many followers of Ramadan faith in the area, on this occasion is of course no question, they are not so mention it, the magazine devotes less space to them as the protagonists of the Islamization of Europe.

The Centre Islamique in Geneva, which was founded in 1961 by Tariq's father, is still one of the main hubs for Islamic-called Islamic propaganda. In London, Ramadan is also the right place. Galt London as the propaganda center of Islam, Germany, the organizational hub of terror and Switzerland and the financial, then the center in Geneva, where brother Hani, the second in the league and continue to work on the introduction of Sharia law, is still an international base of Islamization Europe, in the shadow of the UN offices located very useful by the "neutral" Switzerland "in the family emigrated. Since then the whole global relationship and cooperative spirit is back together ...

He then got to know well Ziegler friend whose wife had should help in the recognition of his doctoral work, the grandfather Al Banna for the recognition of the Ziegler circles, so much was behilfich. One hand washes the other. Sun stuck to the most important thinkers of Switzerland, as Begley reports, posters for the general election campaign of his close friend Jean Ziegler, the family of Al Banna were able to appreciate much more than the Federal candidate and Comrade Brunner, in the Kampgagnen the Federal election of Comrade Ziegler as of a Mullah was vilified. Forgot?

Ziegler has a heart for the humiliated and insulted in the world. It was Ziegler who offered at the outbreak of the Iraq war, he would personally Saddam Hussein a place to stay get in Switzerland, where he could thus prevent the war. A noble idea. Except that the noble man who was personally Hussein on a visit and was impressed by his charm, not to visit in one of his torture cellar was. But the third world movement is moving in equal measure the heart's two brothers. And of course the fate of freedom fighters against Israel. But - in the café sounded a little different from Attac. So that Begley is quite satisfied with the views. which he may bring home from the cafe with Ramadan.

course, the affair of the performance of Voltaire's play "Mahomet" in Voltaire commemorative year 1993 in Geneva spoils the good impression a little. But Begley does everything possible to allay the suspicion, at least mitigate, Ramadan had been playing as a censor in the Swiss cultural scene. The Begley would, would not so on the most important thinkers in Switzerland, the leading newspaper in Basel, namely, the single is so admired, can sit. And lo and behold, it was not Ramadan, it was Mrs. Ziegler. Cherchez la femme! Eric Deuber-Pauli called the wife, the former Geneva's cultural leader and wife of Jean Ziegler, which prevented the performance, by delivering the required 310 000 francs subsidy refused. "

She was actually, there is nothing to gloss over the complicity the couple Ziegler - only: it was Ramadan himself, "an open letter against the performance of" Mahomet "pleaded" as Begley calls the censorship demands, "because this (piece) violates the feelings of the Muslim community." (More about this site by Gudrun Eussner) more

Begley:

"But the bad smell of censorship of artistic freedom hanging to Tariq Ramadan. In 1997 he received the University of Freiburg, a lecturer in Islamic Studies, but his thesis he submitted in 1998 at the University of Geneva, which nearly ended with a scandal. Tariq Ramadan, in its work is a reinterpretation of the Muslim Brotherhood to a kind of religious social progress friends tries and also an academic vindication of his grandfather. The two French experts seemed his doctoral work however so untenable that they withdrew in protest. Since Ramadan turned his old friend and university professor Jean Ziegler, everything began to move to the thesis but still be saved. It was ordered new witness who gave his blessing to the work eventually, but even so, as hinted the mitbeurteilende Berner Islamic scholar Professor Reinhard Schulze does, because they wanted to avoid a scandal. For the rejection not only Ramadan had ended academic career, but would now also been exploited politically. Finally
his thesis is used again and again as proof that Tariq Ramadan himself could be a member of the organization that has founded what he revered his grandfather. As the grandson vehemently denies. "I was never a member of the Muslim Brotherhood." He admired while Hassan al-Banna for his anti-colonial struggle, insured Ramadan. But he has a different image of the West than his grandfather. Journalists from Le Monde, as well as Ian Hamel gefahndet have for weeks in Egypt for links between Ramadan and today's Muslim Brotherhood (which have recently risen six-fold seats in the Egyptian parliamentary elections), but even they have not found it. Even as a young teacher Tariq Ramadan, however, felt the missionary heritage and founded the organization "Muslims, Moslems de Suisse." The response was, however meager, especially in German Switzerland. Especially the immigrants from the Balkans and Turkey are often barely practicing Muslims and therefore not very interested in a man with Arab roots, who will stop at a pious life.
a first major appearance outside the Muslim community procured Ramadan with his friendship with Alain Gresh, the chief editor of the prestigious Le Monde Diplomatique. " Gresh published in conjunction with Ramadan, a book about Islam - for the latter is a worthy reception in France's intellectual salon "

Robert. Redeker in France is not acceptable. But Mr. Begley could not then know, yes.

Final Galions to the large-or stimulus figure in France made him, however, Nicolas Sarkozy, declaring himself ready, a hundred minutes on television to argue with the Swiss philosopher. It was a battle, and Ramadan, it has lost in the eyes of most non-Muslims, oppressed him as the sharp-tongued Minister on the issue of stoning of adulterous women. Whether it is from that provided for punishment in Islam, distancing oui ou non. But Ramadan squirmed and said he wanted "a moratorium".
"We thought this reply might break his neck," recalls the friend of Ramadan Freiburg theologian> Richard Friedli. He's survived, but since then Tariq Ramadan is considered by many liberals in Europe's status as a windy opportunist who can not decide, and not once has the power to distance themselves from Islamic stone-age laws. "

Not so for the left magazine .. remains his master thinker faithfully

"He's survives" is particularly good Ramadan so will survive any stoning, why should he not survive the "conversation" about

Begley: "hand, he is for the Muslim fundamentalists a traitor. And It is only right, since he had to hire an adviser to the British war in Iraq, Prime Minister Tony Blair. "

How do Begley just consider that the Islamic fundamentalists employ Ramadan for the control of the British domestic politics as a betrayal and not as a success? of Ramadan itself?

"Ramadan sees himself in the role of" bridge builder "who gets caught between the crossfire. Because the Islamic scholars on the issue of stoning were not in agreement, he plead in doubt for the victim. "
And if some would be?

We see with Gudrun Eussner the heart of Ramadan's work in Switzerland, the Islamic Center of Geneva, as Bridgehead of the Islamization of Europe. Note:

Because not Islamic scholars are unanimous on the issue of stoning, "he battered sly like a desert snake" in doubt for the victims of doubt "And when the scholars are agreed," What do you mean there. "? that the time has come for the end of the moratorium, Mr. Ramadan advocates doubt for what he has always advocated.

"And so for a perpetual moratorium on all corporal punishment, including death penalty. He condemned the stoning tel quel, but then he makes a joy Sarkozy, Ramadan said in our conversation, but in the Muslim world one would listen to him anymore because he would apply it as a Westerner. "Only with a conviction I change anything in the Muslim world."
If the hot, perhaps, the endorsement of stoning mean any change? What he once again all those who think that giving the Muslim world it is not, as Professor Waardenburg in the TV interview with Frank A. Meyer, probably aware of the same. It will be so diverse. In its essentials, the marriage law, but she seems to agree. (As in all the central issues).

"How this rocky path of change is shown by his own brother, Hani Ramadan is not even him by his Moratorium convincing. "

Why should he? Will he ever? Agree in basic belief but the two agree. The moratorium is only for television, the Hani all I need. Hani can better live with the Shariah without moratorium.

"Ironically, Hani Ramadan, 46, doctor of philosophy, and since the death of Father Said the director of the Centre Islamique, in an article for Le Monde justified the stoning as a punishment with" purifying "effect. AIDS and equal also branded as a punishment from God. Then it the Geneva government has denounced the agency as a secondary teacher at a state school, but so far the courts have Hani Ramadan law given the challenging the dismissal as an abuse. Even if he was to finally get right, Hani has thus ruined the reputation of the family in liberal circles Geneva once and forever. "

Alas. The good" reputation "of Steinigugnsfreunde is ruined. For whom? The Magazine? With Ziegler?

"Comparatively in the media shadow of Tariq and Hani is Aymen, 53, the oldest of the Ramadan brothers, who were born in Egypt. Aymen Ramadan is now a neurosurgeon in Geneva and by the way President of the Centre Islamique. According to "Nouvel Observateur" he's married his second wife with a Sudanese and there appeared regularly and for free as a doctor in use. With the "magazine" he may, however, so little talk about how his brother Hani. "

Oops. There is and but denied a source of truth!
" Because no one has time to read Tariq Ramadan's twenty-two books and all his seven hundred articles (except the intelligence ), it will always be scrutinized in the media on the same sticking points of a "Euro-Islam". And he says in the core and the same:


must follow a Muslim, the Constitution?

Ramadan: Yes.

no exception?

Ramadan: No, because the exercise of our faith is guaranteed in any European constitution.

What this tells with great thinkers Wüstenschlangenschläue, that the Constitution, but faith is followed, the Constitution guarantees. The Constitution should not be compatible with the belief that the Constitution must not be followed. It is anticipated that the Sharia is recognized as the core of this belief from the Constitution.

He could just as well say that he was for a moratorium for the next Holocaust, but for the constitutional loyalty of the Muslims. For Begley is now clear that Ramadan is a constitutional friend. When Ramadan says that, then it must surely agree that his views coincide with the stoning of the Constitution.

Begley gives us his insights into the core of Ramadan fresh from Café:

"His principles are clear. The postfixes that follow all these answers deny, not the principles, but they reveal in particular the core of this man. Tariq Ramadan is not a terrorist friend, not a threat to democracy and no anti-Semite. He is - for European terms -. A religious-conservative "

simpleton is no longer there. Ramadan is not a threat to democracy. At least no greater than Begley & co. For without the Ramadan could be none. But the "conservative" wife beating and stoning to Sharia is not enough the men. You want to further commitments to democracy, instead of saying thank you enough.

Begley has not realized that not only the so-called political terror, but also the daily terror of the Sharia, which is the religion of terror against women is terror, whether with or without the moratorium. " The press man of the Swiss Islam lobby is full of the Islamists into the trap and slimes together with him. His critics, he finds "wild." The stoning of Mr. Begley does not make wild. Him out the cold.

Yes, the woman has the right to wear a veil - such as Ramadan's secretary in Paris. But he certainly believes it is better that she wears a - like his own wife and his little daughter.

In other words, he is not opposed to a woman on which he has no power, with no veil, but at home there's not. There must also believe the daughter to it. All right, Mr. Begley?

Yes, mixed marriages are permitted, Ramadan's wife, Swiss-French dual citizen and is originally a Christian, converted to Islam.

Yes what else! A Muslim woman may not marry unbelievers, but of course the Muslim man can marry a Dhimmifrau as a helper, so that they obeyed him and converted.

And yes, Ayaan Hirsi Ali has a right to say what she wants. (Like Salman Rushdie, too.) But moral Ramadan has its critics wrong.

What looks like this right in the real existing Islam, he does not ask better. Even Begley containing the criticism of Islam by Hirsi Ali is wrong. It threatens yes "the rule of law." In contrast to Ramadan. As the two brothers are together right.

Ramadan: "How can you influence a billion Muslims, if they are simply offended only by saying that the Prophet would apply to today's standards as a pedophile"

Muslims who may operate the child abuse is quite legal as child marriage, may not be offended by telling them that child rape and forced marriage are a crime. Begley not offended Ramadan. If Millions of Muslims the right to marry have children, then child abuse is legal.

"Tariq Ramadan wants to be out of the fifteen million Muslims in Western Europe devout Muslims, confident and not, as now, in 85 or 90 percent of Muslims paper without practice
remain live but following the example of the Prophet." The
Propeht lived in polygamy, and took along with the various female slaves from the war spoils a child as a wife.

"This is what many Europeans fear basically believes Professor Richard Friedli Freiburg. In secular Europe so self-conscious and mission of religious moralist like Tariq Ramadan is a provocation.
Ramadan calls" real Pluralism, "but he does not believe in integration, the Europeans will then succeed as if the Muslim is not to be noted that he is one;. If the religion has so retreated into a purely private, like most Christians"

so is this Islamic religious law that is also publicly recognized. state religion Islam with Sharia law? As in India, or what says the Lord, that religion should not be a private matter?

"European Muslims, like to wish Ramadan they , cease to long for their old home. Instead, they mix into their new, talk with them, choose to go, they learn the rules know and along with the duties finally their rights, which grant them the Western constitutions. "interfere

how they can Begley experience in Londonistan. But he will not even know. He prefers to be taught by the Islamists.

" But to react the Europe of empty country churches and the deep
irritated birth rates, says the religious scholar Friedli. "

Higher birth rates à la Ramadan religion? Professor Friedli chats from a naivety which is intended to fill the churches. The belief in the Men God, which guarantees the Gebärsoll. And when the women no longer believe in the divine right of men and birth control to operate, then you are confused ... ... Ramadan sees this irritation.

"He sees the creeping fear of cultural domination, which is behind the dispute over any proposed new minaret."

It is the legitimate rejection of a new religious dictatorship! Tariq Ramadan says:

"The fifteen million Muslims in Western Europe is a fact, whether one likes it or not. And they will change the homogeneity of the old European culture. True democracy also means to share power, but that some people stop here for a threat. "

parts of what? With an anti-democratic totalitarian religious regime? If the democracy with a dictatorship "Shared" to be Islamic?

"Ramadan is on" shared universal values "of Western democracy and Islam;. On values such as democracy, rule of law, equality of citizens and universal suffrage"

common values such as rabbits and snakes. After eating, they are particularly common. As the "universal" human rights declaration of Cairo? But that does not know Begley. It can be Islam without protest as a "common values" to sell, does not contradict this common and dangerous nonsense served on the readers. Democracy and rule of law as Islamic values! a particularly high value in Islam is the religion of freedom, as it is committed against the apostates.

brings him nothing faster in a rage, as if he senses a Western arrogance that denies Islam precisely those values and the Koran nurmehr sees a reactionary and useless teaching.

Nothing brings the Islamists more furious than the truth about Islam. For the BaZ editorial like the values of the Koran are so common values they share with the Muslim Brotherhood. Whether these are also the value of battered women, we want to doubt.

"In such situations, he moved sharply against the" Western arrogance "going on, what his opponents are waiting, and then rejoice, now Ramadan has finally shown its true face, that of outmoded, narrow-minded concrete Islamists. "

not worry, this is well known. Here only is the face of a Baz-Magazine revealed, but even that is not so new. That Begley feels Ramadan is much closer than his opponents, was later than the interview with Hirsi Ali clearly. critics of Islam are made condescending contempt because the bloody facts prove them right. A primitive form of arg defamation of Islam criticism that has long been analyzed, what about the Begley not, do not understand and do not want to admit. Or just dishonest not to admit it follows the flattest of all the platitudes islamophile:.. the "enemy image" of Islam critic

The Islamic enemy - the infidels, the West - Begley seems not to know. The criticism of Ramadan Muslim countries such as the West over we can go, it's the old records, the "reformers" is so critical. For Sarkozy, he remained an "unreliable", not so for Begley, who knows:

"He is certain to Nicolas Sarkozy, the" Islamists "as Ramadan is now suspected of acting as ideological accelerant in the banlieues. His own intelligence agencies, however, assure the opposite, namely that no perpetrators were and identify the problems at the social and maybe not religious NATURE. says exactly the same Tariq Ramadan, who speaks of "territorial and social apartheid".

exactly what want to hear the Left in France and Switzerland also that it is the Islamic 'culture' is not such an act, but only of "social" issues that have nothing to do with Islam. (Also if the left is his communitarian views are a bit fishy ...) What does he mean by problems?
Does he perhaps the Islamic gender apartheid? Why then, are the French domestic unemployed not just violence against women and the Muslim "youths", why live French people do not like polygamy in the Muslim banlieue, where it is tolerated full? For polygamy presents the Muslim Machos still with all the social problems that creates and perpetuates the same Islam.

that Ramadan spoke out against the violence in the banlieues, has other innocent interviewer, such as that of "Mirror", also "surprised" ... Propagandists of a violent religion are of course "against the violence." What Begley as expected?

Ramadan: "The restoration of order is of course paramount"

Certainly, the question is, which order Ramadan as the definitive in his head.. That question Begley not granted. Because he can under Sharia imagine anything. Therefore he must have been the ideal interlocutor for coffee with Ramadan.

"Back in the café in London. Tariq Ramadan dates, he must continue to soon to Mauritius, but at first the French Clermont-Ferrand, where he is invited to a philosophical colloquium on "La raison dans l'islam». Day the event is canceled. The university authorities to know you can ask him for a Monsieur like him no room available. It is Ramadan thirteenth radius in the last eighteen months. "

trust Apparently the University of the reason of Islam but not quite.