Anti Freezing Pokemon Heart Gold

Dhimensionen the Dhimmköpfe

Kuffar Stauffer in dialogue with Mullah Blancho

"Is there violent Muslims in the Switzerland asks "the NZZ am Sunday, 27/08/2006 naive.

The violence by Muslims against countless forced married women in Switzerland is obviously not as violent, but as a religion. The Basel journalist Beat Stauffer writes here about the Islamists Nicholas Blancho Bieler, one in 2006 on the occasion of the Muslim demonstration in front of the parliament building against the press freedom in Denmark was able to get a good picture. This convert, the wife has the treatment program of the Koran, a figment of a puerile and brutal macho mentality, it made sense as the famous, from BaZ as a great thinker praised Muslim Ramadan's brother, was as Pubertand 16-Islamist, learned Arabic, to read the Koran, can and wants to study law in Switzerland.

He the western to the expression and press freedom-looking Muslim demonstration organized in front of the parliament buildings during the cartoon crisis, where phrases like religion goes against democracy was on the banners, and is consistent Sharia openly about the Swiss law, an excellent conditions for the coming law degree in Switzerland. Where? With whom? at Al Bazhar? In Fribourg, where already came from the tuition of Dr. Ramadan?

Would entered this Islamist as a Holocaust denier to the public, he could not so easily read history Begin unless he would turn into with Prof. circle as a specialist in human rights. For example, peaceful Islamic Jew treatment.

Then the man but only as a secondary matter agrees with the abolition of the Sharia law by the only valid and all its barbarities against women, he enjoys the goodwill of the Schariakompatiblen Swiss jurisprudence. For lack of ability to earn an academic diploma, could find Schulze Professor in Berne and Geneva and to help in Professor Ziegler Friedli as second-and third-party verifiers may also Prof. Jositsch of the SP?

As opponents of the initiative submitted by women custody for sexual recidivists who does not wish also that untherapierbare offenders are locked up effectively, he might have a sense of the Islamic understanding of the law, to give the man all the violence on women and children including the right to rape the wife and child rape, legalized child marriage and the right and Fraueneinsperrung without time limits, legal under Sharia law, life imprisonment. This law requires sexual assault victims instead of perpetrators are locked away for more Tatausübung undisturbed. When lawyers left the pious man can build on understanding of his views.

The article in the NZZ am Sunday, 27/08/2006 is a pattern of politically correct dhimmitude against a militant Islam agent. A few Müsterchen for the head of the dhimmis hesitate before Talib of Bern, he would "understand" by all means follow.

is to this end Stauffer is much stupider than a dhimmi must be, and acts as if he did not understand what represents the Schariajurist clear and admits - the journalist knows the Sharia is not wisely prefer to be as accurate and also provides specifically not a single question about their barbaric rules.

The journalist would not seem that the future will be very disturbed Schariajurist in his project of Swiss law enrichment. Beat Stauffer respects this project, he also believes it is neither cheap nor illegal. Cheap, he finds it just that someone is laughing at the guys and their accomplices, makes it interviewed in all seriousness and with respect.

"The pictures of the praying Muslims before the Federal House (the slogans on the banners of" praying Muslims, "he wisely not) ensured irritation" Notes Stauffer fixed discrete. With whom? For those who know what plan the Muslims before the House of Parliament, they provided no means for irritation, but for the confirmation of what we know. "However, we do not know that from the Swiss press, which conjures the image of a different Islam than that which presents itself as the person he is. The NZZ am Sonntag "is irritated"? Why not simply say, "This is against our constitution, you know that?" Or:

"Why do you want to study a right that they do not recognize? "

" frown caused even those statements that are made a fighting Blancho. If in doubt, the Sharia stand for him to Swiss law, let the young Muslim activist announced " -

This is the correct Swiss dialect for Islamofascists: " of young Muslim activists. "

A militant Blancho, articulated before the dhimmi already without a fight is before the Blancho, the course lays the cards on the table is not blank, say something. Not even a proper "frown", manifests with the the extremely favorable, not the least bit critical interviewer only a slight irritation of the pleasure of the Democrats in the demonstration against democracy, but not so that the "militant Blancho" that the journalists as would like to understand, irritated in any way.

"And what concerns the jihad , reported on it in an effort to understand the promising young Blancho also, so what is an effort in the belief understanding, " he was" not yet on the level. "To take him to the satisfaction of"

Stauffer is also not yet on the level, the faith of the young man can imagine the satisfaction, but he struggles to:

"These comments, so Blancho declared today" (and Stauffer reflect an assumption by him, without him to get through an irritating question from the Islamic concept of) him much trouble would have brought. "

Is that frown so annoying? Or what trouble it might have been because the journalist of this snow-white Blancho not brings.

"blame the media were, which would have given the statements shortened" (One was called like this:... Religion is for democracy in its integrity, the journalist is so discreet that cite just do not know they could NZZ . Sunday readers confuse it this sham is also not a bit cheap, the Happy is in fact understood in the enviable position, or not at all understand wanting to whom he interviewed and what the man says, says Stauffer..

"But It is an almost impossible task, the Islamic understanding of this Bieler converts illuminate closer. "

This is indeed an impossible task when you yourself had no understanding of Islam has, which would enable one to understand the clear statements of dubious Jus candidates than what they are. They are to be understood as easily.

"Blancho says there is only" one Islam "and he simply followed" the principles of Islam. "

What it should not be understood? Blancho is absolutely right, there is only one Islam, but a Koran, only a prophet. Or is there more of them? Only the very stupid dhimmis do not understand that, and Beat Stauffer is either stupid or has in Ernst has set his mind that it is not Islam, not even one, but no, and that it is peaceful, tolerant and moderate when he was only so understand how you want. And is that illuminate hard to correct. For where there are such Islam?

grotesque scene in which attempts a dhimmi with the greatest effort, a real Islamists another Islam to dense than the one he represents openly and it in reality there, and there is no other than the way of Allah as the Qur'an says and the Prophet, and woe to him does not follow, and the Islamist without ifs or buts said as the one, the true, the real existing Islam.

Only Stauffer will not admit, that the Muslims think Islam is no other than Islam, even if Christopher does not know who has already Dhimmensionen of comedy that might make us forget that there is nothing to laugh about in Islam.

"The ideal would be the Islamic state" . O-Ton convert Blancho.

Stauffer, who is in his self-ignorance of Islam completely helpless in the face of Jihad revelations from the puerile Bieler young macho brain that wants to miss all the women in Switzerland, the Sharia as the ideal single law as soon as he could only and ready the land for the admission, this well-intentioned journalist who does not know how to deal with the Schariarechtsmenschen is because its a clear vision of Islamic law not to his own firm projects fit the verdhimmten readers his ideal of a not really existing, but in the head of kuffar ghost of Islamic vorzusetzen want this to get his ideal of the converts also confirmed.

short, Stauffer, the dogmas of the Islamic faith West as apologetic thinking dictation has been in the head set, which is not only not an Islam there and he is second, completely different feel than any of his faithful, who understand him, of course, all wrong, if they take the Koran at the unchanging divine word, but that the Koran should be any interpretations. The dhimmis know him that is better than the Al Azhar. And Islamic law as the student. The convert from Biel has been expressed over the BaZ very clear and said what he advocates:

The ideal would be the Islamic state . The Swiss caliphate of course. But Stauffer kuffar understand it will not. He introduces himself stupid. And the readers sold for even more stupid.

recommended for this purpose it is to know the Koran does not even mention at all, much less quoted, - after which the death penalty, as the film Submission - has meant him so if you understand him as the prophet and often bloody lead by example in those who did not would follow. As he executed on Theo van Gogh was exemplified and all other victims of Islam, the dead and the living threatened.

The interviewer is determined to keep Islam for anything other than his faith. For the purposes of the western Islamic believers, the dhimmis who follow the dictates of tolerance of the media, showing that Islam is not firstly, and secondly there is a peaceful and tolerant.

The reinterpretation of reality by means of Newspeak takes over in such bizarre forms as the efforts of a well-intentioned journalists to "understand" what was said from the Ummabold Biel yet clear what the kuffar but wants to understand not go away. The Islamist knows his Koran and the Sharia. This is embarrassing for the dhimmis who want to know it better than the Muslims carry it with them all their means in mind.

It is easy to understand. But, the Dhimmkopf taken it into his head that everything is completely different than the Koran says, and believes the faithful. He wants his readers prefer to bring the "young Muslim activists' understanding close as one who has not his Islam understood quite sure if he was not so" interpreted "as befits the dhimmis and still not see the situation (!) to realize its full faith and ....

But by the Swiss as favorably with kid gloves touched "young Muslim activist" (!) with the sexual fascist by the violent messages of the prophets dull steamy Pubertandenfantasien in the head, the right to the murderous beatings primates activities that legitimizes the Koran against women, against infidels, against apostates, Jews and Christians and Atheists, has been illuminated at 16, this Swiss Musterexemplärchen from the Koranic school, where you can learn the wife beating strictly according to regulations, makes it to his "understanding" struggling in understanding readiness met questioner not so easy. For answers Blancho not like Beat Stauffer imagines the ideal Islam.

The tries hard not to have the Muslim Brotherhood understood, but the Jihad is now sometimes exhausting, and the Promising males from Biel, was ready already in puberty 16 for the message of Fraueneinsperrer that will please the mini macho so very, all unripe fruits, whose Mulikultimist the mature sexual fascist bullshit flourishes, this lined with Koranic violence-against-women legislation boys brain says Biederman, who wants to understand killed croak not said what the lad from Biel recently, and rather against his better its totally clear "understanding of Islam" from the "ideal state" for "v age ", explains that his original Muslim understanding of Islam is not vague, but completely adequate Koran.

The " young Muslim activist " knows exactly how to deal with the kuffar. As long as the Muslims are still in the minority, they are not what you do, did, or has in mind. It is explained as the ongoing terrorist attacks for "unislamlische activities" and also knows well the author of Islam: the kuffar namely that caused, according to the "young Muslim activists" the terrorist acts and committed. All right. Clear to all who know that Islan not mean peace but submission.

best understanding of Islam: The Muslims are murdered by the fault that they did not follow the way of Allah. Stauffer, the Koran, the logic does not seem so familiar, is irritated thereat. Because of the Kuffar understood not know who he is for the Muslim Brotherhood: a dhimmi in the service of the true real single Islam, has to follow the way of Allah who does not want to suffer the punishment of Allah ... - Stauffer or knows a different Koran than the real world?
The grotesque comedy is ripe. Proposal of Pattern Interview:


dialogue with Blancho blanc

Muslim brother

The ideal would be an Islamic state.

Kuffar:

I do not understand. Should Switzerland be a caliphate?

Muslim brother

I said, for the Dschiad I am not yet ripe.

Kuffar:

"Oh but you were kind enough to explain to Mr Muslim activist us how you think that the jihad for which you do not feel ready? Do you think we still need to access more funding under the arms? Do you feel might be excluded by us in Biel? What could we do for you, activist? Tell us, please, we want to understand so much. You know how much we have your Respect faith "

brother activist

. I tell you already that I just do what is in the Koran. You know the Koran does not appear, you stupid kuffar, this is because you are one of the monkeys and pigs and in a state of ignorance is that is not condoned by Allah "

Kuffar:

." Forgive Please You mean disrespect, I did not want to offend, but I do not understand you right. But Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance. I do not want you to interpret it wrong, it is always on the interpretation of the Koran for Muslims to even any Interpret. You know that there is no real-peaceful jihad, the history of Islam is indeed a story of peace and tolerance, which has spread so peaceful and still by Israel and the American crusaders severely disturbed world peace with his own peaceful means to spread everywhere investigated. Have I misunderstood, Mr peace activist? "

pious brother

." Yes, Islam is peace "

Kuffar:

" Exactly. As you said, yes, Islam is a peaceful tolerant religion, but as you only get to the jihad, it is not un-Islamic? Were you not in the Quran lessons taught that the true Islamic Jihad from scratch is peaceful? The Prophet has even preached peace with all men, especially the Jews who did not understand but ...

pious brother grumpy: Follow

If the unbelievers in the way of Allah and not oppose Islam, and remain peaceful, especially the women and obey their husbands - you understand me safe ....

Kuffar:

Certainly, you are as a future lawyer even better than I know how to treat women properly, the Swiss, already frère Tariq since the necessary turnout model for us found zuammen with brother Ziegler and Schulze (your supervisor, may I ask?) I will, of course, you overdo it is not with the executions, in Switzerland, we initially to more moderate forms of Sharia law, it would be enough if you we say lower the age for marriage at 11, and increase the execution age something, not like in Tehran - I'm thinking, Mrs Calmy-Rey could develop a human form of Hududstrafen for women in Geneva, we are an open Switzerland, or how do you think Mr. activist, I would have understood it so ..

Frommer brother

Islamic peace is a genuine peace. A Peace without Kuffar, you understand me?

Kuffar:

Mr. activist, I do not quite understand, do you think that we are not allowed to participate in your peace?

Frommer brother grumbles something unintelligible.

Kuffar: "how you felt? I still do not understand, you express yourself a little vague.

pious brother r, decidedly:

I said, true peace. Without dhimmis. No more infidels, they must be eliminated wherever they are found. Of course, once we do have the necessary facilities. Do you still do not know you are really so slow-witted, you stupid infidel! I try hard all the time you explain what is going on and try bottomless Dhimmkopf me honey to lubricate the beard and pretend as if this so hard to understand when you do not understand what I say. What do we have to do no ch until you run down what is being played you hard of hearing kuffar. Do we perhaps have the Houses of Parliament for the first blow before it dawns on people like you that we have all along said and lead by example! Religion comes before democracy, you do not understand this about? Present you with our current activities do not they? How many samples you want faith as yet, Monkey! Do not you know that the infidels are animals? We do what we can to show you who we are, but I t understand it is not easy to understand you, I t is that problem, not wi r. Press W e are clearly and distinctly, but they simply lack the necessary comprehension!

Kuffar:

No, no, I have understood you so! I would like to understand so much so, you understand, but I am not sure why you think that behind the activities in New York and Madrid and London are not Muslims, but ..

pious brother

I do not believe it! The believe I t! It is you, stupid! We say that we believe this so he S and believe its the same. They will think you are to blame and not us for what you get it "terror" call?

Kuffar:

Oh, please, no, I did not even speak of terror, I mean it, I've said a word about democracy, I will not offend, I just said that these activities - yes I think so, that we take in the West is a great complicity, we have the religion of peace and tolerance, respect for too little! Even the Swiss Crusades - but we change this, the NZZ is among them, we drive out this profanity. We will improve even more in the way of Allah. Allah is so kind and just, if you only really understand. Allah is a matter of interpretation-
Muslim activist snarls something under his breath:

W hat as they say??

Kuffar:

thought like you? I did not understand you correctly, it sounded so vague, you might think that we need to show more respect for you? I will do my best, I am working hard to fight me!

Muslim activist

The real jihad means fighting yourself, you have to do a real jihad against them! The other left Us, of which you understand nothing. They can not even Arabic.

Kuffar:

No, I'm really sorry. but I could learn maybe we could publish the BAZ and the NZZ in Arabic, when you said ...

pious brother

not necessary, it is in Swiss dialect. We have plenty of methods with which we make our intentions known, not the kuffar have to learn Arabic, nonsense. They have to not listen to our mosques. It is sufficient to teach their wives to house the necessary respect for us, at least you have understood?

Kuffar:

course. Understand. If it's nothing more. To this end we have the SP and the SVP and the churches and dialogue.

Muslim:

Fiddlesticks. Dialogue is one of the stupidest Dhimmiideen. W e do not need dialogue. With it Allah guides no dialogue, you understand that? Allah is not elected democratically.

Dhimmi:

We have also something in the Preamble to the Constitution, we could understand each other but

Frommer brother

Let the inside. The use we can, we will translate it just right. It must, of course, hot Allahu akbar.

Kuffar:

So we should learn Arabic?

Frommer brother

Make us any trouble, there's always a lot of trouble with you, if we try to explain something. As we said in Bern on the federal court: we do not need your democracy on Swiss still in Arabic, we need them at all, if you want to finally understand the times. In the House of Peace, there are no more disbelievers. No Arabic speakers and talk to us after the beard. You should not imagine that we respect that! And now you kindly respect us so that you understand at least what we Tell you a long time.

Kuffar:

I admit that I've been a crusader, I also apologize for it, but -

Frommer brother (laughs for the first time):

you? A crusader? To do this, have not got it, my dear. Since they overestimate themselves.

Kuffar:

"What would they really think that you will soon start at the University of Bern law degree, finally tell young jihadists in Europe if they could do this?
(This idea is not mine, is the original! The Kuffar makes so .. his idea!)

pious brother

"I would tell them that they should deal more intensively with Islam"
(the original sound Blancho)

Kuffar:

Mr. activist, I'm only one stupid kuffar who knows the Koran, but what you find in the table for as your suitcase?

(Kuffar is with bows backwards out the door, crosses himself reflexively)

pious brother

you do not need to cross themselves! Tearing you time your ass up, you miserable Dhimmi! And you finally understand who we are! We do not let ill- Actions carried away, we know that is exactly what we do, where and when. You should also know slow!

************************************************ ************

And to conclude with a quotation from the Swiss live Wohlfülleben:
For Stéphane Lathion (co-author on behalf of the Swiss Federal Commission for Foreigners authored study on Muslims in Switzerland in September 2005 that only marginal reference to the phenomenon of radicalization of young Islamists in Switzerland comes in, as the noted 27th 8:06 NZZ) is clear:
that the risk of radicalization of young Muslims in Switzerland is much lower than in neighboring countries. The reason he looks in the better socio-economic conditions and the more relaxed political climate. Crucial for the future is, however, the strategy towards the Muslim minority would be taken. We must create a climate of trust so that the Muslims feel comfortable and denounce its own initiative any radicals in their ranks, says Lathion. If
Lathion says that, then it must surely agree. The Muslims must feel comfortable with us, so they do not make terror. And what do the Muslims in order to feel good with us? Perhaps the abandonment of their Islamic law? Or, you owe them the recognition of the Sharia, so that also feel very comfortable with us? If forced marriage would be prohibited or punished would be effective, the Muslims are probably not even feel this way. Drum, the Federal Council in its wisdom, made sure that the Islamic Frauenversklaver feel good and also rejected the study of forced marriages in Switzerland. And the Asylum Appeals Commission has made with its recognition of marriage to Schariarecht for a very special feeling of wellbeing of Muslims in Switzerland. Would the men's rights of the Muslim men to be seriously, the men Lathion and brother Christopher would probably not feel comfortable way in Switzerland. Questions Stauffacher the interior.

Burning In Feet After Bath

kuffar in coffee Wed Ramadan

Kuffar over coffee with Ramadan

or La raison dans l'islam

Ramadan and his Swiss believers among the educated

A comment on the meeting with the magazine Begley Ramadan

Regine van Cleeve

(ad Tariq Ramadan, presented by one of his Swiss admirer of the magazine BaZ http://www.dasmagazin.ch/magazin/magazin_artikel.php?ID=3T6BSM)

recommendation for the introduction of the world as the interview week with Tariq Ramadan :
"You are an arrogant man."
http://www.weltwoche.ch/artikel/?AssetID=9305&CategoryID=62

The only so far in Switzerland, in which the Islamic people has been felt on the tooth.

Begley is not arrogant person. Tariq Ramadan is the "Switzerland's most important thinkers in the world," it says there, "although it hardly a" know. "Who is the man," asks Martin Begley, although the ought to know enough at least since the interview in the World Week, which was critical to some extent as the said Baz milieu, and the Ramadan so angry was that he interview broke off. All too familiar with the Western rules of free speech seems to be the most important Swiss philosopher yet, the more comfortable in the Dhimmimedien felt than in the still regimented. Perhaps
to this violation of Islamic feelings of disrespect by the World Week irreparable, Begley has the BaZ Tagi magazine now taken Ramadan, so we can get the true picture. We are always delighted when another Swiss journalist discovered the great thinkers of Ramadan, which we have heard so much .... Yes what Mr. Ramadan is thinking now? the reconciliation of the Muslim religion with the European rule of law:

The message of this "Muslim Globetrotters" ("L'Hebdo") is the "Euro-Islam". Who thought of that because Islam is irreconcilably opposed to the Western law has never known Mr. Begley. The poses a Ramadan, with which the West is to reconcile. His criticism of Begley's a little suspicious, because the threat so as Hirsi Ali "the rule of law," we would like to reconcile with the Ramadan (the Schariarechtsstaat). (See Begley in an interview with Hirsi Ali, where is here because the rule of law *?)

Begley Ramadan is no questions that would irritate him, for Begley is not even Sarkozy.

__________________

* Note Martin Begley said Hirsi Ali (magazine 37/06), whether it is "promising" is when "a Apostates "on the need for reform of Islam write back Ali asks:
." Slave must have been one to criticize the slave trade?
The issue of the magazine was so insidious as the usual Wadenbeisserei the yelper against Islam critic: Have they personally experienced what they write, they are not "objective." If they have not seen anything myself, what they write, they do not know what they are talking. Have they explored it scientifically, is their method incorrectly, etc. (See NZZ Ammann against Kelek.)
__________________________________

Begley: "He wanted, says Ramadan, Muslims in Europe make European citizens of Muslim faith. "

Now the Muslims in Europe are indeed already mostly Europeans, but that they are not infidels, we still do not know. The young Muslims were "fascinated by the first Muslim media star, who is sitting with ministers and scholars at the same table (if it is left rvc) and also cut on the Sharia speaks like the concept of truth in Nietzsche, but preferably about the Prophet." ( About the latter we learn from Begley but unfortunately nothing seems ...)

Even Mr. Begley to be fascinated by the moratorium has indeed something fascinating for the BaZ environment. Why he has so taken with him, he wanted to meet the fascinating person that you thought you sufficiently to know from the duel with Sarkozy, but Beglinger it can not be assumed to be allowed to sit with the man at one table:

" In his native city of Geneva would be Tariq Ramadan immediately recognized and even in Paris, since he sat down in the fall of 2003, seven million viewers, with Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy on French television. But in the narrow café in London where we meet for a two-hour conversation in the midst of Christians, Sikhs and Muslims, it seems no one noticed, even though his picture last July, shortly after the London attacks, emblazoned on the front page of the "Sun". The newspaper looked like a wanted poster, and so it was meant. "

But what is the meaning of confidential meeting for Begley? Although we have never seen on a wanted poster, but who knows, maybe is not the indirect promotion of the "most important thinker of Switzerland as harmless as it does?

was "This" militant Muslim professor "the acceptable face of terror to impressionable young Muslims" and "dangerous." Than many preachers of hate, the tabloid warned his audience of millions. This Swiss, "because of contacts with terrorists" do not travel to the U.S. may belong also banished from England. "

We now know since the interview with Hirsi Ali Begley, Begley that keeps the Islamists from the exile of democracy is a threat to the rule of law.

"The call was in vain. Only days later, Tariq Ramadan was in London a lecture on Islam and the West - under the patronage of Scotland Yard. The London police chief Ramadan was explicitly protected. "

It was also the London police, who declared that he can do nothing against a Muslim anti-Jewish demonstration in Trafalgar Square, was called in to destroy Israel. The mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, took the rabble-rouser expressly protection. Ramadan, however, the adviser and protege of the Prime Minister, who famously holds the Koran for the most advanced book that he knows. (What Blair is the former German Federal President Lübke proves equal, which fell as you give him a book to have said he already had one.) Ramadan advice now Blair by the rules of the most advanced book in the world:

short "on it he summoned none other than Tony Blair in a commission to advise his government on how to keep young Muslims from sliding into terror and radicalism. Similar discussions had already Ramadan with the Dutch Prime Minister Balkenende, was in the land of the filmmaker Theo van Gogh slaughtered in November 2004 by a Muslim was, was made in retaliation for a sharp-Islam film, the Van Gogh with politician Ayaan Hirsi Ali. "

Begley holds the Quran quotes from the writer of the film Submission for sharp criticism of Islam? "Yes, what now?" He asks.

"Is the man a friend of terrorists and a threat to democracy, as its opponents call especially in France? Or one of the "100 most important thinkers of the 21st Century "," Time Magazine has chosen "" to him and the U.S. for its part seems to hold the BaZ ... (The second most important is probably Hans Saner, just be that the messages not yet been proclaimed from the minaret, but it is already time for the construction of minarets to help the less important thinkers to fame.)

Although Begley therefore not yet know who the man is, he meets in London in the café, he knows for sure, that "teaches that Tariq Ramadan since last autumn as a visiting professor at Oxford. There, he thought, "Lectures on Usul al-fiqh, the fundamentals of Islamic law."

Well, since you can know who is the man, or knows of Mr. Begley not the foundations of Islamic law, perhaps? They are not so difficult to understand, one must just read a little about the words and deeds of the Prophet, then you have it, the basics. And would have to actually know that they are incompatible with the basic laws of democracies. But the BaZ Magaziner, the do not know and wants to leave the explanation of Mr. Ramadan, which is a real rule of law with the right Islam and all its true believers. Because where would the rule of law, if it were up to Hirsi Ali!

know him outside of Geneva in Switzerland, but hardly anyone says Beglinger, or confuse you with Tariq Hani, "yet his notorious brother, who made himself as a defender of stoning to death of it." The needs are still fascinating.

"but had no other Swiss", white Beglinger, "by Roger Federer apart," had "the world's media in recent decades as more reports on Tariq Ramadan." And the city BaZ medium, which impressed the mighty man. The man was "found on all channels. No fewer than five books have been published in France since 2000 about him, among which two wild settlements with the supposedly duplicitous preachers of aggressive Islamism. A sixth book is published in the coming months, probably the first sober and well-researched biography of Ramadan, written by French journalist Ian Hamel. "(Note March 07: One more news about the Prophet as a role model has just been added)

since we are fully drawn. Also in the BaZ there should be a Mr. Hamel yes, but he writes with two mm, such as mutton, which is not found at all world channels, but was responsible for all the gossip columns in Basel. Whether he might have written the biography of Ramadan secretly?

What Mr. Begley makes us very curious but these are the two "wild statements", whose titles and authors, he tells us, unfortunately, as Ramadan had dissuaded him from it and the BaZ editors. For this we learn that it is except for one type BaZ Hamel, everything about life has collected from Ramadan. And have found no support for connections to terrorist Oranisationen of his research. We need to go no further than the compounds that Ramadan has already with his work to upgrade the Islamic ghettos. The manual of terror called the Koran and the daily terror against women is called Sharia, what more could you want? But since the terror against women and for Begley is not a terrorist, you remain the "proof" of course, guilty. The religious terrorism is not usually as a terrorist when there is no explosive in the game, but Fox and the butcher's knife and the honor killers.

For Ramadan not only has no objection in principle against stoning, but is also an advocate of hitting women, but then asks Mr. Begley does not, he would not want to spoil the good atmosphere in the café, or if Mr tune Ramadan and left the table on which one agrees so well in the democratic Islam, as in the Islamic democracy. Finally, this is not a World Week interview. For the purpose of building confidence Begley quotes now January Hamel, who in turn quotes a French official as follows:

"I never had knowledge of any connections of Ramadan with a radical organization. And common sense tells me that he would be subject to an entry barrier, if we knew of such compounds. "

The same was explained to him the Swiss news service that had also been a thorough exchange with Ramadan, tells Begley.
Now if that is so - the hats Hamel said, then it must surely agree. Maybe ask one more time in Basel Begley Mr. Hammel to who knows maybe even the one and others to contribute from his gossip columns. We also do not doubt that what Mr. Hamel has found out to Mr. Ramadan, that is nothing suspicious. Because he is looking in the wrong place. He did not need to penetrate Swiss news service, reading the Koran would have been enough, yes. But the trust in these news groups ran no one, right?. These are the basics of the law that Ramadan teaches. And Hirsi Ali has quoted from it for a screenplay. But the director was killed on the instructions of the Quran.

Ramadan is regarded not only as a protégé of Ziegler and Co in the Swiss left-wing circles, he should also get a professorship at the Catholic Notre Dame University in Indiana, which was the alliance of Islam, left, and church would be complete. Only well known that nothing was out of it, because the United States gave him no entry permit. It was true, as Begley to report white, to "violent protests in the United States against the stifling of academic freedom," which can also appear in Switzerland to be understood as Ramadan, where Voltaire performances No chance - freedom of expression on the ground, have bedeubt since the Ziegler accomplices them. The protests against the "curtailment of academic freedom" were probably from those circles that had been mobilized against a host of Jewish historian Bat Ye'or seminar at the University of Georgetown without the Rector would have defended against harassment by the Islamic side was as experienced www.secularislam.org to be> in the discussion forum years ago.

your Swiss counterparts are those of friends who tried in the court case against the Jews Frank Luebke, the viewers with brute force to prevent the observation of the trial. Something interesting in the magazine environment but not. After all, there are now two authors referred to have solved the brother Tariq: Caroline Fourest (Brother Tariq) and Lionel Favrot (Tariq Ramadan dévoilé). Whether the "wild statements" should be, which opposes Beglinger the first "sober" Ramadan's biography of Jan Hamel? As an example of quasi. For what is a genuine followers of the prophetic role model that is based entirely sober on the model according to the views of the model. As Ramadan is oriented as in his dissertation by the Geneva Uniiversiät rejected propaganda written to his grandfather al Banna hate. Except that Mr. Begley did not also oriented, neither sober nor otherwise. Ramadan and it has probably been told by the Prophet, about whom he speaks loudly Begley prefers.

No word about the good words and deeds? Why not? If you go after London, to meet the most important Swiss thinker, you should still bring home something from his favorite subject with and the expectant reader, know the Ramadan still not at all to enrich a few Müsterchen from the life of the Prophet, so they share in the revelations from the London Café can. Who was he? Already a Thomas Widmer in the world week we tried to lead the Prophet in all his gigantic size in mind, without us, but quite convincing to. Now we would like to hear of Mr. Begley, what should it be the Giants in this man? But he is silent as to do so. He would not want that the humanitarian values of Islam put an end to him, understandably.

Of all suspicion of terrorism, there remains nothing, "says Ian Hamel, having combed through Ramadan's books and articles and he also observed repeatedly in his appearances on stage in France." (And Mr. Hamel has forgotten to comb through the Koran.) Religious Terror Sharia against women is not a terrorist for the master race. calm Begley knows:
"Tariq Ramadan attacks in New York has also openly condemned as those in Madrid, Bali and London. "

who wanted him there any close to the model of Islamic terrorists and religious terror suspect? Begley report even know that Ramadan at the "destruction of Israel" hold on (at the meeting in the café.) And say: ". Nothing in Islam can legitimize anti-Semitism or xenophobia"

We take note with interest that the Koran "Nothing "in Islam.
that Ramadan's grandfather and father of the 20 Islamists Century ", which to this day as a" thought leader is revered by Islamist terror groups between Sudan and Afghanistan, "in the thesis of the grandson is an honor rescue should know, that makes for Begley not particularly suspicious to stand close to the Muslim Brotherhood to be even one. He knows that the small Al-Banna "painful decades in political exile" had to spend.

from the painful decades of Islam persecuted, the way other than Ramadan and Beglinger may not be open to see in a coffee shop, if there are too many followers of Ramadan faith in the area, on this occasion is of course no question, they are not so mention it, the magazine devotes less space to them as the protagonists of the Islamization of Europe.

The Centre Islamique in Geneva, which was founded in 1961 by Tariq's father, is still one of the main hubs for Islamic-called Islamic propaganda. In London, Ramadan is also the right place. Galt London as the propaganda center of Islam, Germany, the organizational hub of terror and Switzerland and the financial, then the center in Geneva, where brother Hani, the second in the league and continue to work on the introduction of Sharia law, is still an international base of Islamization Europe, in the shadow of the UN offices located very useful by the "neutral" Switzerland "in the family emigrated. Since then the whole global relationship and cooperative spirit is back together ...

He then got to know well Ziegler friend whose wife had should help in the recognition of his doctoral work, the grandfather Al Banna for the recognition of the Ziegler circles, so much was behilfich. One hand washes the other. Sun stuck to the most important thinkers of Switzerland, as Begley reports, posters for the general election campaign of his close friend Jean Ziegler, the family of Al Banna were able to appreciate much more than the Federal candidate and Comrade Brunner, in the Kampgagnen the Federal election of Comrade Ziegler as of a Mullah was vilified. Forgot?

Ziegler has a heart for the humiliated and insulted in the world. It was Ziegler who offered at the outbreak of the Iraq war, he would personally Saddam Hussein a place to stay get in Switzerland, where he could thus prevent the war. A noble idea. Except that the noble man who was personally Hussein on a visit and was impressed by his charm, not to visit in one of his torture cellar was. But the third world movement is moving in equal measure the heart's two brothers. And of course the fate of freedom fighters against Israel. But - in the café sounded a little different from Attac. So that Begley is quite satisfied with the views. which he may bring home from the cafe with Ramadan.

course, the affair of the performance of Voltaire's play "Mahomet" in Voltaire commemorative year 1993 in Geneva spoils the good impression a little. But Begley does everything possible to allay the suspicion, at least mitigate, Ramadan had been playing as a censor in the Swiss cultural scene. The Begley would, would not so on the most important thinkers in Switzerland, the leading newspaper in Basel, namely, the single is so admired, can sit. And lo and behold, it was not Ramadan, it was Mrs. Ziegler. Cherchez la femme! Eric Deuber-Pauli called the wife, the former Geneva's cultural leader and wife of Jean Ziegler, which prevented the performance, by delivering the required 310 000 francs subsidy refused. "

She was actually, there is nothing to gloss over the complicity the couple Ziegler - only: it was Ramadan himself, "an open letter against the performance of" Mahomet "pleaded" as Begley calls the censorship demands, "because this (piece) violates the feelings of the Muslim community." (More about this site by Gudrun Eussner) more

Begley:

"But the bad smell of censorship of artistic freedom hanging to Tariq Ramadan. In 1997 he received the University of Freiburg, a lecturer in Islamic Studies, but his thesis he submitted in 1998 at the University of Geneva, which nearly ended with a scandal. Tariq Ramadan, in its work is a reinterpretation of the Muslim Brotherhood to a kind of religious social progress friends tries and also an academic vindication of his grandfather. The two French experts seemed his doctoral work however so untenable that they withdrew in protest. Since Ramadan turned his old friend and university professor Jean Ziegler, everything began to move to the thesis but still be saved. It was ordered new witness who gave his blessing to the work eventually, but even so, as hinted the mitbeurteilende Berner Islamic scholar Professor Reinhard Schulze does, because they wanted to avoid a scandal. For the rejection not only Ramadan had ended academic career, but would now also been exploited politically. Finally
his thesis is used again and again as proof that Tariq Ramadan himself could be a member of the organization that has founded what he revered his grandfather. As the grandson vehemently denies. "I was never a member of the Muslim Brotherhood." He admired while Hassan al-Banna for his anti-colonial struggle, insured Ramadan. But he has a different image of the West than his grandfather. Journalists from Le Monde, as well as Ian Hamel gefahndet have for weeks in Egypt for links between Ramadan and today's Muslim Brotherhood (which have recently risen six-fold seats in the Egyptian parliamentary elections), but even they have not found it. Even as a young teacher Tariq Ramadan, however, felt the missionary heritage and founded the organization "Muslims, Moslems de Suisse." The response was, however meager, especially in German Switzerland. Especially the immigrants from the Balkans and Turkey are often barely practicing Muslims and therefore not very interested in a man with Arab roots, who will stop at a pious life.
a first major appearance outside the Muslim community procured Ramadan with his friendship with Alain Gresh, the chief editor of the prestigious Le Monde Diplomatique. " Gresh published in conjunction with Ramadan, a book about Islam - for the latter is a worthy reception in France's intellectual salon "

Robert. Redeker in France is not acceptable. But Mr. Begley could not then know, yes.

Final Galions to the large-or stimulus figure in France made him, however, Nicolas Sarkozy, declaring himself ready, a hundred minutes on television to argue with the Swiss philosopher. It was a battle, and Ramadan, it has lost in the eyes of most non-Muslims, oppressed him as the sharp-tongued Minister on the issue of stoning of adulterous women. Whether it is from that provided for punishment in Islam, distancing oui ou non. But Ramadan squirmed and said he wanted "a moratorium".
"We thought this reply might break his neck," recalls the friend of Ramadan Freiburg theologian> Richard Friedli. He's survived, but since then Tariq Ramadan is considered by many liberals in Europe's status as a windy opportunist who can not decide, and not once has the power to distance themselves from Islamic stone-age laws. "

Not so for the left magazine .. remains his master thinker faithfully

"He's survives" is particularly good Ramadan so will survive any stoning, why should he not survive the "conversation" about

Begley: "hand, he is for the Muslim fundamentalists a traitor. And It is only right, since he had to hire an adviser to the British war in Iraq, Prime Minister Tony Blair. "

How do Begley just consider that the Islamic fundamentalists employ Ramadan for the control of the British domestic politics as a betrayal and not as a success? of Ramadan itself?

"Ramadan sees himself in the role of" bridge builder "who gets caught between the crossfire. Because the Islamic scholars on the issue of stoning were not in agreement, he plead in doubt for the victim. "
And if some would be?

We see with Gudrun Eussner the heart of Ramadan's work in Switzerland, the Islamic Center of Geneva, as Bridgehead of the Islamization of Europe. Note:

Because not Islamic scholars are unanimous on the issue of stoning, "he battered sly like a desert snake" in doubt for the victims of doubt "And when the scholars are agreed," What do you mean there. "? that the time has come for the end of the moratorium, Mr. Ramadan advocates doubt for what he has always advocated.

"And so for a perpetual moratorium on all corporal punishment, including death penalty. He condemned the stoning tel quel, but then he makes a joy Sarkozy, Ramadan said in our conversation, but in the Muslim world one would listen to him anymore because he would apply it as a Westerner. "Only with a conviction I change anything in the Muslim world."
If the hot, perhaps, the endorsement of stoning mean any change? What he once again all those who think that giving the Muslim world it is not, as Professor Waardenburg in the TV interview with Frank A. Meyer, probably aware of the same. It will be so diverse. In its essentials, the marriage law, but she seems to agree. (As in all the central issues).

"How this rocky path of change is shown by his own brother, Hani Ramadan is not even him by his Moratorium convincing. "

Why should he? Will he ever? Agree in basic belief but the two agree. The moratorium is only for television, the Hani all I need. Hani can better live with the Shariah without moratorium.

"Ironically, Hani Ramadan, 46, doctor of philosophy, and since the death of Father Said the director of the Centre Islamique, in an article for Le Monde justified the stoning as a punishment with" purifying "effect. AIDS and equal also branded as a punishment from God. Then it the Geneva government has denounced the agency as a secondary teacher at a state school, but so far the courts have Hani Ramadan law given the challenging the dismissal as an abuse. Even if he was to finally get right, Hani has thus ruined the reputation of the family in liberal circles Geneva once and forever. "

Alas. The good" reputation "of Steinigugnsfreunde is ruined. For whom? The Magazine? With Ziegler?

"Comparatively in the media shadow of Tariq and Hani is Aymen, 53, the oldest of the Ramadan brothers, who were born in Egypt. Aymen Ramadan is now a neurosurgeon in Geneva and by the way President of the Centre Islamique. According to "Nouvel Observateur" he's married his second wife with a Sudanese and there appeared regularly and for free as a doctor in use. With the "magazine" he may, however, so little talk about how his brother Hani. "

Oops. There is and but denied a source of truth!
" Because no one has time to read Tariq Ramadan's twenty-two books and all his seven hundred articles (except the intelligence ), it will always be scrutinized in the media on the same sticking points of a "Euro-Islam". And he says in the core and the same:


must follow a Muslim, the Constitution?

Ramadan: Yes.

no exception?

Ramadan: No, because the exercise of our faith is guaranteed in any European constitution.

What this tells with great thinkers Wüstenschlangenschläue, that the Constitution, but faith is followed, the Constitution guarantees. The Constitution should not be compatible with the belief that the Constitution must not be followed. It is anticipated that the Sharia is recognized as the core of this belief from the Constitution.

He could just as well say that he was for a moratorium for the next Holocaust, but for the constitutional loyalty of the Muslims. For Begley is now clear that Ramadan is a constitutional friend. When Ramadan says that, then it must surely agree that his views coincide with the stoning of the Constitution.

Begley gives us his insights into the core of Ramadan fresh from Café:

"His principles are clear. The postfixes that follow all these answers deny, not the principles, but they reveal in particular the core of this man. Tariq Ramadan is not a terrorist friend, not a threat to democracy and no anti-Semite. He is - for European terms -. A religious-conservative "

simpleton is no longer there. Ramadan is not a threat to democracy. At least no greater than Begley & co. For without the Ramadan could be none. But the "conservative" wife beating and stoning to Sharia is not enough the men. You want to further commitments to democracy, instead of saying thank you enough.

Begley has not realized that not only the so-called political terror, but also the daily terror of the Sharia, which is the religion of terror against women is terror, whether with or without the moratorium. " The press man of the Swiss Islam lobby is full of the Islamists into the trap and slimes together with him. His critics, he finds "wild." The stoning of Mr. Begley does not make wild. Him out the cold.

Yes, the woman has the right to wear a veil - such as Ramadan's secretary in Paris. But he certainly believes it is better that she wears a - like his own wife and his little daughter.

In other words, he is not opposed to a woman on which he has no power, with no veil, but at home there's not. There must also believe the daughter to it. All right, Mr. Begley?

Yes, mixed marriages are permitted, Ramadan's wife, Swiss-French dual citizen and is originally a Christian, converted to Islam.

Yes what else! A Muslim woman may not marry unbelievers, but of course the Muslim man can marry a Dhimmifrau as a helper, so that they obeyed him and converted.

And yes, Ayaan Hirsi Ali has a right to say what she wants. (Like Salman Rushdie, too.) But moral Ramadan has its critics wrong.

What looks like this right in the real existing Islam, he does not ask better. Even Begley containing the criticism of Islam by Hirsi Ali is wrong. It threatens yes "the rule of law." In contrast to Ramadan. As the two brothers are together right.

Ramadan: "How can you influence a billion Muslims, if they are simply offended only by saying that the Prophet would apply to today's standards as a pedophile"

Muslims who may operate the child abuse is quite legal as child marriage, may not be offended by telling them that child rape and forced marriage are a crime. Begley not offended Ramadan. If Millions of Muslims the right to marry have children, then child abuse is legal.

"Tariq Ramadan wants to be out of the fifteen million Muslims in Western Europe devout Muslims, confident and not, as now, in 85 or 90 percent of Muslims paper without practice
remain live but following the example of the Prophet." The
Propeht lived in polygamy, and took along with the various female slaves from the war spoils a child as a wife.

"This is what many Europeans fear basically believes Professor Richard Friedli Freiburg. In secular Europe so self-conscious and mission of religious moralist like Tariq Ramadan is a provocation.
Ramadan calls" real Pluralism, "but he does not believe in integration, the Europeans will then succeed as if the Muslim is not to be noted that he is one;. If the religion has so retreated into a purely private, like most Christians"

so is this Islamic religious law that is also publicly recognized. state religion Islam with Sharia law? As in India, or what says the Lord, that religion should not be a private matter?

"European Muslims, like to wish Ramadan they , cease to long for their old home. Instead, they mix into their new, talk with them, choose to go, they learn the rules know and along with the duties finally their rights, which grant them the Western constitutions. "interfere

how they can Begley experience in Londonistan. But he will not even know. He prefers to be taught by the Islamists.

" But to react the Europe of empty country churches and the deep
irritated birth rates, says the religious scholar Friedli. "

Higher birth rates à la Ramadan religion? Professor Friedli chats from a naivety which is intended to fill the churches. The belief in the Men God, which guarantees the Gebärsoll. And when the women no longer believe in the divine right of men and birth control to operate, then you are confused ... ... Ramadan sees this irritation.

"He sees the creeping fear of cultural domination, which is behind the dispute over any proposed new minaret."

It is the legitimate rejection of a new religious dictatorship! Tariq Ramadan says:

"The fifteen million Muslims in Western Europe is a fact, whether one likes it or not. And they will change the homogeneity of the old European culture. True democracy also means to share power, but that some people stop here for a threat. "

parts of what? With an anti-democratic totalitarian religious regime? If the democracy with a dictatorship "Shared" to be Islamic?

"Ramadan is on" shared universal values "of Western democracy and Islam;. On values such as democracy, rule of law, equality of citizens and universal suffrage"

common values such as rabbits and snakes. After eating, they are particularly common. As the "universal" human rights declaration of Cairo? But that does not know Begley. It can be Islam without protest as a "common values" to sell, does not contradict this common and dangerous nonsense served on the readers. Democracy and rule of law as Islamic values! a particularly high value in Islam is the religion of freedom, as it is committed against the apostates.

brings him nothing faster in a rage, as if he senses a Western arrogance that denies Islam precisely those values and the Koran nurmehr sees a reactionary and useless teaching.

Nothing brings the Islamists more furious than the truth about Islam. For the BaZ editorial like the values of the Koran are so common values they share with the Muslim Brotherhood. Whether these are also the value of battered women, we want to doubt.

"In such situations, he moved sharply against the" Western arrogance "going on, what his opponents are waiting, and then rejoice, now Ramadan has finally shown its true face, that of outmoded, narrow-minded concrete Islamists. "

not worry, this is well known. Here only is the face of a Baz-Magazine revealed, but even that is not so new. That Begley feels Ramadan is much closer than his opponents, was later than the interview with Hirsi Ali clearly. critics of Islam are made condescending contempt because the bloody facts prove them right. A primitive form of arg defamation of Islam criticism that has long been analyzed, what about the Begley not, do not understand and do not want to admit. Or just dishonest not to admit it follows the flattest of all the platitudes islamophile:.. the "enemy image" of Islam critic

The Islamic enemy - the infidels, the West - Begley seems not to know. The criticism of Ramadan Muslim countries such as the West over we can go, it's the old records, the "reformers" is so critical. For Sarkozy, he remained an "unreliable", not so for Begley, who knows:

"He is certain to Nicolas Sarkozy, the" Islamists "as Ramadan is now suspected of acting as ideological accelerant in the banlieues. His own intelligence agencies, however, assure the opposite, namely that no perpetrators were and identify the problems at the social and maybe not religious NATURE. says exactly the same Tariq Ramadan, who speaks of "territorial and social apartheid".

exactly what want to hear the Left in France and Switzerland also that it is the Islamic 'culture' is not such an act, but only of "social" issues that have nothing to do with Islam. (Also if the left is his communitarian views are a bit fishy ...) What does he mean by problems?
Does he perhaps the Islamic gender apartheid? Why then, are the French domestic unemployed not just violence against women and the Muslim "youths", why live French people do not like polygamy in the Muslim banlieue, where it is tolerated full? For polygamy presents the Muslim Machos still with all the social problems that creates and perpetuates the same Islam.

that Ramadan spoke out against the violence in the banlieues, has other innocent interviewer, such as that of "Mirror", also "surprised" ... Propagandists of a violent religion are of course "against the violence." What Begley as expected?

Ramadan: "The restoration of order is of course paramount"

Certainly, the question is, which order Ramadan as the definitive in his head.. That question Begley not granted. Because he can under Sharia imagine anything. Therefore he must have been the ideal interlocutor for coffee with Ramadan.

"Back in the café in London. Tariq Ramadan dates, he must continue to soon to Mauritius, but at first the French Clermont-Ferrand, where he is invited to a philosophical colloquium on "La raison dans l'islam». Day the event is canceled. The university authorities to know you can ask him for a Monsieur like him no room available. It is Ramadan thirteenth radius in the last eighteen months. "

trust Apparently the University of the reason of Islam but not quite.

Where To Buy Fake Leather

Zwitschertöne in Germany radio with Weidner

Zwitschertöne

with Mullah Stefan Weidner

Ad DLF 03/19/2006 nuances

The Dhimmifunk now has the very first experts on Islam in Germany distended: Stefan Weidner, chief editor of a magazine of the Goethe Institute, founded by Annemarie Schimmel.

Mullah Weidner is one of the experts on Islam in Muenster Forum for Theology:
experts on Islam

Ludwig Amman> detractors of Hirsi Ali
Hartmut Bobzin> orator of the Prophet
Navid Kermani> polemic applied in DLF against Ralph Giordano
Gernot Rotter> Islamapologet Volker S. Stahr
> Mold students vilified, threatened critics of Islam
Edward Said> inventor of Orientalism-tale (criticism see Kohlhammer)

In this league of apologists who will now be consulted more by the media that the slowly around talking Islam criticism that they do not prevent all were able to put a stop, is Stefan Weidner. He is the DLF targeted against the imaginary "enemy image of Islam", a phantom, its dubious genesis and metastasis in anything but anti-Islamic German media, churches and the Dialogue together praying Koran stays on in 2001 by Siegfried Kohlhammer under the title The enemies and friends of Islam were analyzed.

According to the consensus between Weidner and DLF a completely false picture of the Islamic violence by people like the sociologist Wolfgang Sofsky is (in the "world") represent the subject to the angry anti-Western Muslims murder intentions, a brand for the interviewer devious idea, against which we now calling up the mold students Stefan Weidner. He must indeed know what all the experts of Islam and Warner can not know before the Islamic militancy.

For the purpose of the resolution of all such eccentricities woos dhimmi
radio-wife Küchler the guarantor of true Islamic studies with fondant ultra-song voice, as it would apply, as fresh acquired harem slave to caress the great Sultan, and to persuade them of their qualities. It stabilizes already acoustically formally the wisdom that flows from the lips of Mr. Weidner, in heartfelt empathy so that you do not know which of the two, some with the other.

Wolfgang Sofsky that they (probably after the "preliminary"?) Picked out as an example for something devious as warning against the ever openly expressed plans of the faithful of the Dschihadreligion is here for everyone else, the most aggressive in front of the religion of the world and its expansion in Europe to warn and educate about it. As such as early Alexandre del Valle, as recently in France Gurfinkiel, as in the U.S. Robert Spencer, as in Germany Siegfried Kohlhammer, Hans-Peter Raddatz Hartmut Krauss and many other competent critics, that of the willing helper of God in Dhimmifunk all as unknowns and unbelievers remain hidden for the attention of their keyword encoder from the mold-school, they actually appeared in a bubble of flattery tones with which the listeners are to be soaped to listen to the findings of a Stefan Weidner, constitute the warnings of Islam is an absurdity. For a great Oriental scholar as Annemarie Schimmel has been guided all the right path to Allah.

Mr. Weidner is a little sad

Mr. Weidner is "a little sad about how this discussion (about the Danish cartoons) is running. As it has been unleashed. "

He is "too sad, as some journalists act, .. who beat his chest and cast clearly culturally combative tone. "

The Dhimmifunk is not among the culture warriors. Of such sounds you hold in the "nuances" nothing where the Zwitscherfrauen instead to mock the prophets of all harem bulls, reconcile ourselves with the culture that wants to eliminate ours. enough with these lovely little voice Woman Küchler the mold schoolmaster the sponge that takes him grateful to every corner of suspicion is wiped off the criticism of the religion of peace. Are no false notes come on as Sofsky, here it sounds like in a beauty salon, our guide has been visited by the ITB for us in Omam on the "Sunday stroll" of the DLF. Here the head is very knowledgeable moisturised and massaged until everything smells and shiny. (This smells of the Orient ..)

"Where are our sensibilities," Mr. Weidner asked but still. "Are not they might be just as great as that of religious groups in Islam?"

Welch a bold idea! Who would they make up any difference between Islam and democracy. Mr. Weidner has perhaps read Sofsky?
What may be the "religious groups" (the "pious"?) In the otherwise non-religious Islam as well, asking the radio-therapist not wisely. For they know not themselves.

"These are all things we have hidden for too long," Mr. Weidner know now turn to hide and they hastily re Sofsky, who called a spade a spade, to pass off as ignorant. At the same time but then he seems to know "things", "over which we have never really thought about." (!)

against those suspected of the listeners and do not continue the DLF Mr. Weidner has at hand. "We" find ourselves at least the fifth year after 11 September, but "we" seem to have "never really thought about." For, as the tour guide of Oriental Tours (> encounters with the strange world) seems to be Lord of his Weidner believes "we" were all he had and never considered correct.

The writer Ben Jelloun, the Kopfmasseuse, have recently expressed the Islamic world was "on the incident just waiting to cry out loudly and angrily to what they from the West and of western Muslims separated. Whether he, Weidner argues that even this opinion.

The Weidner is not. Weidner knows: "It's more that the media have been waiting so as to represent the Muslims can"!
Remember: There is no Islam, it is only by the West as "presented" as if the WTC attacks again been committed by Muslims. All of New York has been waiting on it.

A new version of the apology. so far the West Was always to blame for the terror, of which he was surprised - which is why the terrorist Supporter tried explain to him that the West did indeed "caused" the terrorism itself, but to date they gave even that one is not expected to have. Now the interpretation of art a new dimension of overtones achieved: namely, the Western media have on the violence only maintained to the Muslims "to represent so" (as they imagine). That is to be enjoyed.
The foam penetrates through the pores to become the brain. The murder of Theo van Gogh was probably staged by the director as a representation for his film to represent the perpetrator as to the butcher, as the media want it. Van Gogh have resulted in fact in his slaughter by the Muslim religious director.

We therefore have a loud anti-Muslim media in the west of the grotesque islamophile to do political correctness who do not want peaceful Muslims, but eagerly await the outbreak of Muslim violence - which is basically a media invention, if we understand Weidner right. The anti-fascists are also waiting for fascist crimes.

not the Islamofascists are so violent joy, but the West wants to "render as" just can not - ". In front of the cameras" as they are described herself, but they do so only your indignation play on the West only the Western Media sake, because this representation need to do.

The violence in the Muslim world against the West are not real, they are only the West sake staged, because the Muslims do not want to disappoint his expectations, considerate as they are. This is called adaptation to the foreign culture. Similar views about the origin of Islamic terrorism from the West also spread easily purchasable NZZ, which operates its business casual in Zurich, in intimate proximity to Islamic banking.

Without performers like Weidner we would not know by whom the violence of the said Muslims actually. In any case, not by the Muslims. He thus joins the ranks of German philosophers, the 11 September as a media production of "interpret". For Sloterdijk is the attack on the WTC not a real event, just a media event, because there were more deaths in the U.S. as victims of 11 September. (Henryk Broder called the "intellectual neglect".)

Weidner has executed a close look: "If we look closely, we note that an absolute minority of Muslims on the street is." (Such a minority, that large corporations assure not to use Danish products anymore. The fact that the German Press Council immediately before the Moslemmob bows and the refrain "Respect Respect Respect" is intoned throughout the media. respect for the religion of jihad, not for democracy of course. Oh, the little small tiny minority, the great big EU-million payments to terrorist organizations moved.

In France, white Weidner, were far more people took to the streets against the new labor law (!), So many "are a hundred thousand more than in the entire Islamic world over the cartoons took to the streets."
Oh, the . The violence in the West at home, in the East, it is only by the Western media "represented." There are the known Zwitschertöne of the "vanishingly tiny tiny minority", the largest mass-acclaimed hero in the Islamic world, Hitler is, its popularity with the cheering masses only by the luminous figure of Bin Laden is exceeded.

If in this Muslim world, a tiny, a minority are missing, one that is no longer there, then there are the dissidents and protesters against religious terror. Such thoughts are far away unbelieving Weidner wisdom. It is neither he nor the Zwitschertönerin on. The man forgets or omits aware that in France there are no embassies in Islamic countries are lit. That in any Western country hordes of protesters for a boycott of Arab goods is called. That no country in the West Islam declared war, as Iran threatens Israel with the approval of the anti-Jewish Muslim masses, the masses like so visibly excited that the Atomdschihadprogramm against Israel and has wide support in German red-green peace circles. Ahmadinejad must present a "tiny minority" support, Hamas has received no tiny number of votes. But French demonstrators for Weidner violent than Hamas. In short, while sounds from all the tubes in Germany the song from the dialogue of cultures, the DLF discovered the source of violence in the West.

Muslims "who are sad" and Muslims "who proceed to violence to violence
stride sounds better than lawn.

The trivialization of violence against the Moslemmobs a European country takes on grotesque proportions. There are very many Muslims, "the sad who are injured ", but" those who actually walk to violence "are" much less than in France. " That we would have to "bear in mind first."
Yes, we have to time to heart.

should accept the "unrest" in the Muslim suburbs in France, the civil war-like proportions, now be an example for Muslim violence? If we are only grieving Muslims from eyes that are so hurt about the existence of democracies that they are calling not only for the destruction of Israel in its sadness, but not by the existence of the Western press freedom want to be hurt. A tiny minority? A, before the pathetically the entire Western media majority ... In the DLF one knows how to treat these injuries and lubricates the balsam and wax of hypocrisy on the religious "feelings" of Muslims, so do not lose it and even more light instead of the Danish embassies, the editors of the DLF. The prevent
know the nuances. The service from the Huri melts already formally sheer sense of the feelings of Muslims, a true Vaseline for the wicked wicked abuses of Muslims, it feels and sounds like NehmenSiediesesGel (just as the melting of Sunday stroll the DLF).

I touch my head and wonder just what we do with the molten women? Women with a brain like pudding made with cream. Women as for the harem of the Caliph trained.

We know now: There is much more violence and terror in the West, Islamic world than from the proceeds. Still missing that the DLF announced it would be a lot more attacks by Jews against Muslims in France than by Palestinians against Israelis. Lie tactic à la Takiya is not a privilege of the Muslims, Islam and the West Lobby, it has mastered perfectly. If we are only the attacks against infidels in mind, such as the slaughter of van Gogh.

But such ideas / representations are the Säuselfrau completely away from the nuances. The Eincremerin is concerned: If the one (referring to the much greater violence in the West than in the Islamic Middle East), "perhaps even a man like the sociologist Wolfgang Sofsky bear in mind, who recently expressed in the world about the protests in the Islamic world, did he but known in fact as' attack on our lives? "

That the hingechmelzene before the Islamic terrorist brothers Dhimmifunkdame that does not have the faintest idea of Islam, the Islam critics something" would bear in mind "that must Consider, in mind and really melt in your mouth can:

"... the protests in the Islamic world, but has he actually referred to as 'attack on our lives?"

Welch latter articulates this in a tone of incredulous indignation, the sense of' Yes, it is possible! "Because the life of the DLF Dhimmidämlichkeit massage parlor has not been so attacked, only that the cartoonists and editors of Jyllandposten is threatened, which cares of the Huri Dhimmifunkdienst when other less mainstreamlinige European media are under terrorist threat? What it will take care of that greasy pores of the brain Huri, feel in their presence, the customer so pleasant and wallow, as in Islam is paradise, if anywhere else in Europe Islam critic killed and threatened murderous? (In a radio discussion with Hans-Peter Raddatz, who was then already was under police protection, was the critics of Islam from the other islamophile participants interrogated literally, because he allegedly Muslims "provoked".'ve

because any criticism of the inspired religious and legitimate barbarities for the dhimmis of service is already a "provocation", it prevails criticism ban. However, the dictators of the left-Islamofascist opinion cartel would refuse to tolerate any criticism of the collaboration. pursuers feel like that is pursued.

The Dhimmidämlerin zitert now from the article by Sofsky a row that she met with an incredulous audible shudder:

"The mass of the pious wishes of her unbelieving mortal enemies are caught, they will burn and shafts, it has the West as a whole in its sights. The only freedom to which it is made is to kill freedom. "

What a terrible wicked thought that one of the raging, furious lynch-, embassies Moslemmob kindling, which is to move as the fish in the waters of the Islamic masses seems also assumed something of its intent to murder! Even the murderers of dissidents in Islamic countries in the "Rushdie rules" of Koonraad Eelest be presented or made subject to the instigators of the murder of Theo van Gogh, the pleasure of wells and burning! Such a thing never happened before in the Islamic world! It's just the media depiction of the lighted messages that the Muslim mob set fire did not so, only the media wanted it so and waited for and donated to the Muslims. So that they finally gave in Moslemmob.

"What you hear such words?" Superimposes concerned Islam understand a response template as sweet in the mouth, "Fear? Scaremongering? Hysteria? The implicit claim: 'Now is finally an end to the tolerance
A claim like this. Paradieshuri seems a bit fishy. No more tolerance for terror? Because receives the Dhimmidame to do with fear. Hysteria not seen her on the side of rampaging Muslims, but on the western front of the Warner Gewaltträchtigkeit of Islam.

Weidner know what it is at Sofsky:

"I read first ignorance of it. Sofsky seems to know at all the Islamic world. "

In contrast to Weidner, who proffered him sucking the sweet relish, savor his knowledge of Islam against the ignorance of the critic, who do not know the Islamic countries. This includes Weidner from the criticism of Islam, the only ignorance may be based, that is the Dschahaliya not yet converts and converts, while he, Weidner, there "regularly several times" in hinreist and white: "If it were the case that all the pious have us by the throat, then I would no longer can sit here. "

To say only that the devout not do the Islamic religious dhimmis by the throat, when the faithful have arrived where they want, namely the German caliphate, then Weidner no longer being converted to his expert post sit, but he is still sitting up. By the throat just wanted the pious people like Rushdie, Farag Foda, or Taslima Nasreen, Ibn Warraq, Theo van Gogh or Hirsi Ali. But but not one Stefan Weidner, his throat is no longer in danger. Nor those of the allerleibst dümmelnden Dhimmidämchen come from these Zwitschertöne. Since all others are threatened, as the ex-Muslim women, women like Hirsi Ali, Necla Kelek, Taslima Nasreen, Wafa Sultan or Arzu Toker. But no Weidner. The islamkriecher live very much risk-free as the critics of Islam.

This melting quality Zwitschertöne from the DLF are the anticipatory echo of the dhimmi media to the next minaret calls from Germany Funk.

Weidner tells us where it is safe and where it is dangerous lives:
"I travel in the Arab-Islamic world much safer than in the two parts of Western, and the Christian world. "

Whether this agent of Allah in the" Arab world "under the chador travels? Ooder rumreisen may seem like the man and woman there so sure? And of course he is in the West, especially the Christian world more threatened than in the East, from the already raved about his Inspiratorin mold, which is felt by the ayatollahs much safer than in countries where a Salman Rushdie had to hide, of the Muslims insecure so that they are sold out his murderous publishers. The non-Muslim countries are in fact insecure countries, as Weidner is right, but not for Mr. Weidner.

Even the DLF staff Müller-Ullrich had similar white beautiful fairy tale about "Democracy" to report in Bangladesh as Weidner of Arabia, a "democracy" represented the Taslima Nasreen all wrong! For he too was threatened there like her from a raging Moslemmob, but could be quite sure that no acid attack was planned for him.

also Chrismonredaktor Burkhadt Weiss was not murderers of "honor" a threat when he was in "Palestine" where he had seen no murdered women - hence! The bodies are not even around on the streets. Everything just imagination and Western propaganda.

The man can be helped, so the feel much less safe in the mainly Christian West. If he is convicted as a Christian court for stoning or flogging for adultery or witnesses how western demonstrators the embassies of Islamic countries to light in Germany, then he must go only to the editors of Germany radio and even he is safe against the excesses of the Christians against the Muslims and Islam friends. There are still islands of non-violence in Germany! There are subtle nuances in the war of the West against Islam!

How safe they feel in Israel, he says, but that's not his preferred destination. For Stefan Weidner, who in a contrast with the Arab countries "run-down mennen demanding Germany" speaks as we learn more in between - should know where the journey, if you go to countries "learn a lot" of which the West still has to degenerate.

For example, how to deal with press freedom. With democracy and human rights. Which are in Islamic countries not just as much "run down" like in Germany! The social and political conditions are now in the Islamic countries in a far more good than in the backward state of Germany. At what level of these countries are against Germany, which still to "learn" as much of them can be read in the Arab Report.

Why so many millions of people striving in the Muslim countries in the run-down West in order to allow him to partake of the blessings of their culture and develop at their height up. Weidner is a harbinger of these developments, a real aid workers of the run-down of Germany, which he already further advanced by using the Goethe Institute helps to make the necessary lessons in development.

"In Brazil, I can never move as freely as I can move in any Arab country." As long as the Lord does not move as freely as a woman alone by every Arab Country. Otherwise he should just in the black bag on the street and not behind the wheel, he would not get caught with a man in the car who is not related to him, dhHerrn Weidner's freedoms were in Arabic, Mr Law empire severely restricted, he would be there as herrenlsose woman running around, he would picked up by the religious police and disappear in an Arab hole, never to meet again. But Mr. Weidner is not a sub-human in Islam, Mrs Küchler of the "nuances" that accepts a believer, what storyteller Weidner her because vorerzählt is itself far from the area could be to travel as freely as the man in the exemplary safe countries. But it's not even notice. Mr. Weidner is also not a Jew, or even Israeli, who wants to visit a synagogue in the Arab countries. He is a German-Dümmel dhimmi, which can move around among his friends feeling as free as any of the women of his Arab friends, who can not only get caught in a taxi without a male relative as guardian. But this is one for the German friend of the Muslim brothers not to have been more than a half-century German travelers with good friends ...

Weidner higher motives

Therefore, Weidner from the comments of the critic to read "real not just ignorance .. If all the will to make a bit of humor and thereby set the scene. These are all very base motives, I think ... "(!)
Such is the DKL staged infomercial Islam lobby with more elevated types not nachzusagen. The collaboration with Islamofascism has most noble motives, like a Paradieshuri, dissidents and critics are just "low." We have to remember this type of collaboration of the informer and his motives. Now is the
Säuselfrau with the razor voice, the almost dead before dedication to the lobby of the ordered liar, another, the experts ask for the "image of the West in the Arab States": "How strong are the resentments pronounced against it, what is called Western modernity?"

you know of course that you just called so; that in fact the Arab countries, the real, are modern, as it has just learned of the Allah Officer . Yes, there she asks just the right, who also knows that people in the West a completely false picture of the "enemy image of the West" makes the man from Germany can judge much better than an ex-Muslim from Syria, warns.

It is not only Sofsky who can take a picture, so are all dissidents from Islamic countries in the western exile, which is wary of the DLF to question. Instead, he kowtowing to Islam around the lobby. O-Ton Mullah Weidner: "Against the Western modernity, there is absolutely no resentment. On the contrary, Western modernity is worshiped. "

Finally someone who tells us what we suspected all along. The West has everything you could as a democracy, referred to as legacy of the Enlightenment, freedom rights, human rights of the individual, is honored by the countries that do not recognize such rights. Drum known to be its institutions that stand for these values revered by the Arab countries, as targets destroyed funded by Islamic countries, terrorism and Hitler is download the most acclaimed character next to bin. All of Devotion to democracy.

We leave here the presentation at the nadir of the brain massage from DLF and left it to the readers, to get an idea of the amount of the disposition of Weidner & co. The lobby of Islamofascism has already occupied the German media, with very few exceptions, such as the "world" to venture where even the last free journalists to provide the Islamofascist terror and the lower levels of their lobbying the forehead. Whether Weidner is a lower Kuffar or even been a higher degree of self-abasement before the terror-oriented religious totalitarianism Converted remains to be seen. GS

Who may occur as the next person skilled in the Dhimmilandfunk, to enlighten us ignorant about Islam? Ludwig Ammann? Udo Steinbach? ? Ayyub Köhler)

>> more mullahs: Historical customer in the DLF with Baumgarten: